Proving Singular (2x2) Matrix Can Be Written in 2 Forms

  • Thread starter Thread starter vilhelm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a singular (2x2) matrix can be expressed in two specific forms: either as A = \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ ta & tb \end{bmatrix} or A = \begin{bmatrix} ta & tb \\ a & b \end{bmatrix}. The proof hinges on the determinant condition, where for a singular matrix, det(B) = ad - bc = 0, leading to the conclusion that one row is a multiple of the other. The participants clarify the proof structure, emphasizing that the proof must show the implication from the determinant being zero to the matrix taking one of the specified forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically singular matrices.
  • Familiarity with determinants and their properties in 2x2 matrices.
  • Basic knowledge of matrix notation and operations.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving ratios.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of singular matrices in linear algebra.
  • Learn about determinants and their role in matrix theory.
  • Explore matrix transformations and their implications on linear independence.
  • Practice writing formal mathematical proofs, focusing on implications and equivalences.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone interested in understanding matrix theory and proof writing techniques.

vilhelm
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have to proove that a singular (2 x 2)-matrix can be written as

a b
ta tb

or

ta tb
a b

My attempt is not a real proof, and as I'm very inexperienced with writing proofs, maybe someone could write it, so that I will understand it in the future.

Attempt.

Let B =
a b
c d

From the definition, det(B)= ad-bc.

For a singular matrix, det(B) = 0.

Hence ad-bc=0 <=> ad=bc <=> a/c=b/d.

We have that one row is a multiple of the other.

If A=
a b
ta tb
then we have a/ta=b/tb <=> 1/t=1/t, and that's true for all real t > 0.

And if
A =
ta tb
a b
Then we have ta/a=tb/b <=> t=t,
which is true for all t,a,c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The final portion of your proof is backwards.

Your are saying that if [itex]A= \begin{bmatrix}a & b \\at & bt\end{bmatrix}[/itex] then |A|= 0.

What you want to prove is the other way: if |A|= 0 then [itex]A= \begin{bmatrix}a & b \\at & bt\end{bmatrix}[/itex].

You are correct that if ad- bc= 0, then a/c= b/d. Let t= a/c= b/d.
 
How about assuming the matrix is on the form:
[itex]\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> a & b \\<br /> ta & tb\end{array}\right)[/itex]
Then the determinant is:
[itex]atb - tab = 0,\forall t,a,b\in\mathbb{R}[/itex]
q.e.d. Can you work the other one out then?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K