Proving Steady State Temperature Distribution in a Disk

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Analysis
In summary, the proof shows that the steady state temperature in a disk is never higher than the highest temperature on the boundary. Additionally, it is proven that for a steady state temperature distribution in a disk, the coldest spot is on the boundary, unless the temperature is constant throughout the disk. This is due to the fact that the maximum temperature in the disk is always equal to the maximum temperature on the boundary, which is the coldest spot, and the temperature in the disk is never colder than the temperature on the boundary.
  • #1
Dustinsfl
2,281
5
Prove that the steady state temperature in a disk is never higher than the highest temperature on the boundary.
Prove that for a steady state temperature distribution in a disk, the coldest spot is on the boundary, unless the temperature is constant throughout the disk.
How is this part suppose to help? I don't see it.
$$
\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}P(r,\theta)d\theta = 1
$$
Recall from calculus that
$$
m(b - a)\leq\int_a^bf(x)dx\leq M(b - a)
$$
where $M$ and $m$ are the maximum and minimum, respectively on the interval $[a,b]$.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let's apply this to our disk. Let $M$ be the highest temperature on the boundary and $m$ be the lowest temperature on the boundary. Applying the above theorem, we get$$m(\pi - (-\pi)) \leq \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}P(r,\theta)d\theta \leq M(\pi - (-\pi))$$Since the integral of any function is equal to 1, we can conclude that $$m \leq 1 \leq M$$Therefore, the maximum temperature is $M$, which is the highest temperature on the boundary, and the steady state temperature in a disk is never higher than the highest temperature on the boundary.To prove that for a steady state temperature distribution in a disk, the coldest spot is on the boundary, unless the temperature is constant throughout the disk, we can use the same proof as above. Since the integral of any function is equal to 1, if the temperature was constant throughout the disk, then the maximum and minimum would be equal, and they would both be equal to 1. However, since the temperature on the boundary is not constant, we can assume that the maximum temperature on the boundary is greater than the minimum temperature on the boundary. Thus, the maximum temperature in the disk is the maximum temperature on the boundary, which is the coldest spot, and the temperature in the disk is never colder than the temperature on the boundary.
 

Related to Proving Steady State Temperature Distribution in a Disk

1. What is Laplace-Fourier analysis?

Laplace-Fourier analysis is a mathematical technique used to analyze and understand the behavior of complex systems in terms of their frequency and time domain representation. It combines the concepts of Fourier analysis, which deals with periodic functions, and Laplace transform, which deals with non-periodic functions.

2. What types of systems can be analyzed using Laplace-Fourier analysis?

Laplace-Fourier analysis is commonly used in the fields of mathematics, physics, engineering, and signal processing to study linear systems such as circuits, mechanical systems, and signal filters. It can also be applied to non-linear systems, although the results may not be as accurate.

3. How does Laplace-Fourier analysis differ from other mathematical techniques?

Unlike other techniques, such as differential equations or time-domain analysis, Laplace-Fourier analysis allows for the transformation of complex problems into simpler algebraic equations. This makes it easier to solve and analyze the behavior of the system.

4. What are the benefits of using Laplace-Fourier analysis?

Laplace-Fourier analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of a system's behavior in both the frequency and time domain, making it useful in predicting and controlling the response of a system. It also allows for the identification of system parameters and the design of optimal control systems.

5. Are there any limitations to Laplace-Fourier analysis?

While Laplace-Fourier analysis is a powerful tool, it does have some limitations. It is only applicable to linear systems and may not provide accurate results for highly non-linear systems. It also assumes that the system is time-invariant, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
960
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top