Graduate Proving Subadditivity of Entropy for Uncorrelated Systems in Pure States

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the subadditivity of entropy for uncorrelated systems in pure states, specifically showing that the entropy of the combined system S(ρ_AB) equals the sum of the entropies of the individual systems S(ρ_A) and S(ρ_B). It begins with the definition of the combined density operator ρ_AB as the tensor product of the individual density operators ρ_A and ρ_B. The reduced density operators for systems A and B are derived using the trace operation. Participants suggest working in a basis where the density operator is diagonal to simplify the trace of the logarithm. The conversation emphasizes that using product states is sufficient for the proof without needing specific assumptions about the individual density operators.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Two systems A & B (with orthonormal basis ##\{|a\rangle\}## and ##\{|b\rangle\}##) are uncorrelated, so the combined density operator ##\rho_{AB} = \rho_A \otimes \rho_B##. Assume the combined system is in a pure state ##\rho_{AB} = |\psi \rangle \langle \psi |## where ##|\psi \rangle = \sum_{a,b} c_{ab} |a \rangle |b \rangle##. The reduced density operator for A is ##\rho_A = \mathrm{tr}_{H_{B}} (\rho_{AB}) = \sum_{a,a',b} c_{ab} \overline{c_{a'b}} |a \rangle \langle a'|##, and similarly for B. Now to show ##S(\rho_{AB}) = S(\rho_A) + S(\rho_B)##,
\begin{align*}
S(\rho_{AB}) &= -\mathrm{tr}_{H_A \otimes H_B} (\rho_{AB} \ln \rho_{AB}) \\
&= \sum_{a,b} \langle a| \langle b| (\rho_{AB} \ln \rho_{AB}) |a \rangle |b \rangle
\end{align*}How to proceed with the trace of the logarithm? Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
How to proceed with the trace of the logarithm?
Work in basis in which ##\rho## is diagonal! (There is also the Renyi entropy trick, but you don't need it here.)
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
You don't need any specific basis. Using the product states for taking the trace in the OP together with the product state ##\hat{\rho}_{AB}## is sufficient (you don't need to assume anything about the ##\hat{\rho}_A## and ##\hat{\rho}_B## either!).
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
852
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K