MHB Proving $\text{GL}_{2}(R): Showing Homomorphism & Isomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoName3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
NoName3
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $\text{M}_2(R)$ denote the ring of $2 \times 2$ matrices with coefficients in $R$.

(a) Show that the group of units in $\text{M}_2(R)$ is $\text{GL}_2(R) = \left\{A \in \text{M}_2(R): \text{det}(A) \in R^{\times} \right\}$;
(b) show tha $\text{GL}_2(R) \to R^{\times}$ is a homomorphism;
(c) prove that $\text{GL}_2(R)$ is isomorphic to $S_3.$

(a) $\text{GL}_{2}(R) = \left\{\dfrac{1_R}{\text{det}(A)}A^{-1}: \det(A) \ne 0_R\right\}$. But $\dfrac{1_R}{\text{det}(A)} = \det(A^{-1})$ and $\det(A^{-1})\cdot A^{-1}$ $ = A \in \text{M}_2(R).$
Moreover, $\text{det}(A) \ne 0 \implies \text{det}(A) \in R^{\times}$ thus $\text{GL}_{2}(R) = \left\{A \in \text{M}_2(R): \det(A) \in R^{\times}\right\}, $ is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks a bit backwards to me. You want to show that if $\det(A) \in R^{\times}$, that there exists $B$ such that $AB = I_2$.

You can do this by calculating, for:

$A = \begin{bmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{bmatrix}$

$B = (\det(A))^{-1}\begin{bmatrix}d&-b\\-c&a\end{bmatrix}$

(note this only makes sense if $\det(A) \in R^{\times}$).

This shows that $\text{GL}_2(R) \subseteq (M_2(R))^{\times}$.

To show the reverse inclusion, it is easiest to use part (b) first: we have for a matrix $A$ in $(M_2(R))^{\times}$ that there is a matrix $B$ such that $AB = I_2$.

Hence $1 = \det(I_2) = \det(AB) = \det(A)\det(B)$, which shows that $\det(A)$ is a unit of $R$.

It's not clear what you mean by "integers in $R$", for a general commutative ring $R$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
814
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
750
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K