Proving that sum of Rational #s is Rational

  • Thread starter Thread starter rs21867
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational Sum
rs21867
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Let a and b be rational numbers. Prove or provide counterexample that

A) a+b is a rational number.
B) Is ab necessarily a rational number?




2. How can you prove that the sume of two rational number is rational? Well I am not really good at math



3. This is what I've tryed to do for part a. But I'm stuck proving the sum (product) of two integer is an integer.

Since a and b are rational numbers they can be written as a=x/y and b=w/z where x,y,w,z are all integers. Then a+b= x/y+w/z = (xz+wy)/(yz)

Now I'm stuck, and I have no clue how to do part B...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rs21867 said:
1. Let a and b be rational numbers. Prove or provide counterexample that

A) a+b is a rational number.
B) Is ab necessarily a rational number?




2. How can you prove that the sume of two rational number is rational? Well I am not really good at math



3. This is what I've tryed to do for part a. But I'm stuck proving the sum (product) of two integer is an integer.

Since a and b are rational numbers they can be written as a=x/y and b=w/z where x,y,w,z are all integers. Then a+b= x/y+w/z = (xz+wy)/(yz)

Now I'm stuck, and I have no clue how to do part B...
You are exactly right for (a): you have shown that a+ b= (xz+ wy)/(yz) and so is the ratio of two integers (and the denominator yz is not 0 because neither y nor z is 0).

To do B, do exactly the same thing! If a= x/y and b= w/z, what is ab? Is it a ratio of two integers? Could the denominator be 0? If anything, B is easier than A because it is easier to multiply two fractions than to add!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top