Proving the Cauchy Inequality for Natural Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArcanaNoir
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
ArcanaNoir
Messages
778
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I'm working on a Cauchy inequality proof, and I'm at a point where I need to prove:
[itex]a+ \frac{b}{n} = a\sqrt[n]{b}[/itex] iff [itex]a=b[/itex]

Anyway, is it even possible to prove this? If it isn't I need to hurry up and get about another method. If it is possible, I don't mind thinking on it some more.
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Hi ArcanaNoir! :smile:

This doesn't seem true. Take a=b=n=2, then

[tex]a+\frac{b}{n}=3[/tex]

but

[tex]a\sqrt{n}{b}=2\sqrt{2}[/tex]

and these are certainly not equal. So at least one of the implications fails.

Looking at the graph of

[tex]x+\frac{y}{2}-x\sqrt{y}[/tex]

suggest that the other implication fails as well.
 
Okay, I think I fixed it.
[tex]\frac{na+b}{n+1}=\sqrt[n+1]{a^nb}[/tex]
 
I'm not well versed in proof writing but couldn't you just algebraically show it's true for a=b?

As in:

[tex]\frac{na + a}{n+1} = \sqrt[n+1]{a^na}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(n+1)a}{n+1} = \sqrt[n+1]{a^{n+1}}[/tex]
[tex]a = a[/tex]

Though this would require that n cannot equal -1, but I think you may already have that restriction.
 
Clever-Name said:
I'm not well versed in proof writing but couldn't you just algebraically show it's true for a=b?

As in:

[tex]\frac{na + a}{n+1} = \sqrt[n+1]{a^na}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(n+1)a}{n+1} = \sqrt[n+1]{a^{n+1}}[/tex]
[tex]a = a[/tex]

Though this would require that n cannot equal -1, but I think you may already have that restriction.
This would only prove one implication. This is an if and only if proof, so you have to prove that
[tex]a=b \implies \frac{na + b}{n+1}=\sqrt[n+1]{a^nb}[/tex]
AND
[tex]\frac{na + b}{n+1} = \sqrt[n+1]{a^nb} \implies a=b[/tex]
 
Last edited:
isn't that what the op wants though? This statement is true iff a=b...
 
BrianMath is right. It's the second thing I need most, the first part of the biconditional is easy.

A and b are greater than zero and n is a natural number.