Proving the Cauchy Integral Theorem for Complex Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter brad sue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Cauchy Integral Theorem in the context of complex analysis, specifically focusing on proving an integral involving a rational function. The original poster seeks clarification on the theorem and its application to a specific integral problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about the closed surface required for the theorem's application and mentions a lack of initial attempts. Some participants suggest using the Cauchy Integral Formula and completing the square for the integrand. Another participant proposes a contour integration approach involving the upper half-plane and the residue theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. The original poster indicates a willingness to explore the suggestions further.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the specification of the closed surface necessary for applying the Cauchy Integral Theorem, which may affect the approach to the problem.

brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I don't understand the cauchy theorem on complex analysis.
I have this problem and I would like to have some help for it.

The question is:
Use the Cauchy Integral Theorem to prove that:
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{x^2-2x+5}dx=\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

It is told to have a closed surface . but here it is not specified. So I have nothing to offer as a try but I am still searching:rolleyes:

Thank you for your help.
B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, my first thought was to look up the "Cauchy Integral Formula"! I didn't actually look them up but If I remember correctly, it is
[tex]f^(n)(x)= \int \frac{dz}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}}[/tex]
You might want to "complete the square" to get the deominator in that form.
 
The contour you want is along the positive real axis and then close with a counterclockwise circle of radius R is the upper half plane and let R->infinity. The integrand can be factored into 1/((z-r1)(z-r2)) where r1 and r2 are the two roots of the quadratic. Only one is in the upper half plane. Apply the Cauchy Integral formula to that. This tells you what the value of the contour is. Now show you can ignore the contribution from the circular part as R->infinity. Since the value of f(z) there is ~1/R^2 and the length of the circular arc is ~R. This is an application of the Cauchy integral formula called the residue theorem.
 
Thank you both for the insight.
I will try to work it out.
B
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K