Proving the Equivalence of Two Formulas with e as Small

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equivalence of two mathematical formulas involving the small variable e. The first formula, m1 = \frac{-1+\sqrt{1-4e}}{2e}, simplifies to -1 + O(e), while the second formula, m2 = \frac{-1-\sqrt{1-4e}}{2e}, simplifies to -1 + O(1). The participants analyze the implications of the big O notation, particularly O(e^2) and O(1), in the context of small values of e, highlighting the importance of understanding how these terms affect the simplification process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of big O notation and its implications in calculus.
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of square roots and fractions.
  • Basic knowledge of limits and asymptotic analysis.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and simplifications in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of big O notation in detail.
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions and their applications in approximating functions.
  • Explore the concept of limits and their role in calculus.
  • Practice algebraic manipulation techniques for simplifying complex expressions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and analysis, as well as anyone involved in mathematical proofs and simplifications.

KateyLou
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Taking e to be small, we have been given these two formulas to prove

m1 = \frac{-1+\sqrt{1-4e}}{2e} = \frac{-1+(1-2e+O(e^2))}{2e} = -1+ O(e)

m2= \frac{-1-\sqrt{1-4e}}{2e} = \frac{-1-(1-2e+O(e^2))}{2e} = -1+ O(1)

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution




Firstly, the second stage in each of these? I am assuming what they have done is say that
(1 - 4e) = (1 - 2e + O(e2))2
If you do this manually you get
(1 - 2e - O(e2) - 2e + 4e2 + O(e3) + O(e2) - O(e3) + O(e4))
Is this right - I am assuming O(e^2) means "some term of the order e^2

This simplifies to
(1 - 4e + O(e2) + O(e3) + O(e4)
And as e is little the O(e2) can be neglected...however if this is the case then when both including O(e2) at all??

Secondly (sorry)
breaking down the first equation is ok:
= -1/2e +1/2e - 2e/2e + O(e2)/2e
= -1 + O(e)

however breaking down the second equation
= -1/2e -1/2e +2e/2e - O(e2)/2e
= -1/e + 1 - O(e)

Our tutor said that 1 - O(e) is the same as O(1) because O(e) is small; but if this is so, why doesn't the first equation become -1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
have had another go at this, and still cannot work out the first bit - the random removal of O(e^2) in some places and not others :-(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K