Proving the Existence of a Single Real Root Using Derivatives

REVIANNA
Messages
71
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


the original function is ##−6 x^3−3x−2 cosx##

##f′(x)=−2x^2−3+2sin(x)##
##−2x^2 ≤ 0## for all x
and ##−3+2 sin(x) ≤ −3+2 = −1##, for all x
⇒ f′(x) ≤ −1 < 0 for all x

The Attempt at a Solution



this problem is part of a larger problem which says
there is a cubic function which can have at least one real roots
than we prove (like the above) that the derivative is negative and therefore the function is strictly decreasing (so it cannot intersect the x-axis again to have another root coz it cannot increase)
therefore it has exactly one real root (not three)

my problem is how they proved that ##-3+2 sin(x)## is -1
how is the sin(x) value +1
does it not oscillate b/w -1 and 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivative is not correct, and the original function is not a cubic function due to the cosine.

REVIANNA said:
how is the sin(x) value +1
does it not oscillate b/w -1 and 1?
It does oscillate, but a smaller sine value makes the inequality even stronger.
That's why the two parts are connected via ##\leq## and not =.
 
  • Like
Likes REVIANNA
mfb said:
cubic function due to the cosine.
yeah the derivative is wrong x^2 has a coefficient -18
and the inequality is correct (I was not paying attention)
does cosine(and trig fns) also change the degree? I thought that only the highest power of x indicated the degree
 
Cosine and sine are not powers of their argument, the function is not a polynomial function of any degree.
 
mfb said:
the function is not a polynomial function of any degree.
So,How do you think about the max no of roots for the function?
 
It has at most one root, as shown in the first post. The proof via the derivative works for all functions with a derivative, they don't have to be polynomial functions.
 
  • Like
Likes REVIANNA
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top