Proving the Fourier Series for a Real, Odd Function

robgb
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The Fourier Series!

Hi guys, I'm having a bit a trouble helping my daughter with this question on the Fourier series approximation:

The Fourier series for a real, odd function, f(t) can be written as:
f(t) = [SUM to infinity, n=1, of]: b[subscipt n] sin(nwt)
where f(t=T)=f(t) and w=(2[pie])/T

Prove that b[subscipt n] = 2/T [integral between T/2 & -T/2 of]: f(t)sin(nwt)dt

Sorry about not knowing how to do all the symbols etc, but if you write it out I'm pretty sure it makes sence.

Anyway, if anyone could give me a hand with how to go about proving this, it would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks, Robert.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Robert,

You have a function of t represented by the series

f(t) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \sin{n \omega t}

And you'd like to know what the \inline{b_n} are. You're also given the condition \inline{f(t + T) = f(t)}, which just indicates the function's period is \inline{T}.

You're not even required to figure out what the \inline{b_n} are; you're just asked to demonstrate that they are, in fact

b_n = \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} f(t) \sin{n \omega t}\ dt.

To do this, first note the following fact:

\begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} \sin^2{\left( \frac{2 \pi n t}{T} \right) }\ dt &amp;= \frac{T}{2}<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />

for all n, and use it to perform the following steps:

\begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} f(t) \sin{n \omega t}\ dt &amp;= \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} \left[ \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \sin{n \omega t} \right] \sin{n \omega t}\ dt\\<br /> &amp;= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} b_n \sin^2{n \omega t}\ dt\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{T}{2} b_n<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />

Does this make sense?

- Warren
 
Thanks mate, yep i essentially understand, just 1 question though:

How did you get from the second line to the third line in the following:

\begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} f(t) \sin{n \omega t}\ dt &amp;= \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} \left[ \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \sin{n \omega t} \right] \sin{n \omega t}\ dt\\<br /> &amp;= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} b_n \sin^2{n \omega t}\ dt\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{T}{2} b_n<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />

Could you work me though that bit in a little more detail mate?

Thanks a lot,
Robert.
 
Originally posted by robgb
Thanks mate, yep i essentially understand, just 1 question though:

How did you get from the second line to the third line in the following:

Could you work me though that bit in a little more detail mate?

Thanks a lot,
Robert.
i think chroot pulled a fast one on you. there is a bit more to the trick that you have to realize to make the infinite summation turn into a single term, with one integration.

to see this, first let me remind you of some trigonometric identities:

<br /> \cos(a\pm b)=\cos a\cos b \mp\sin a\sin b<br />
so
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> &amp;\frac{1}{2}(\cos(a-b)-\cos(a+b))\\<br /> &amp;=-\frac{1}{2}\cos a\cos b+\frac{1}{2}\sin a\sin b\\<br /> &amp; -\frac{1}{2}\cos a\cos b+\frac{1}{2}\sin a\sin b\\<br /> &amp;= \sin a\sin b<br /> \end{align}<br />

we need to use this identity to evaluate some integrals:

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> &amp;\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\sin(\frac{2\pi mt}{T})\sin(\frac{2\pi nt}{T})\ dt=\\<br /> &amp;\frac{1}{2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\cos\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T}\ dt-\frac{1}{2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\cos\frac{2\pi(n+m)t}{T}\ dt=\\<br /> &amp;\left\frac{T}{4\pi(n-m)}\sin\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T}\right]^{T/2}_{-T/2}\\<br /> &amp;-\left\frac{T}{4\pi(n+m)}\sin\frac{2\pi(n+m)t}{T}\right]^{T/2}_{-T/2}\\<br /> &amp;=0<br /> \end{align}<br />
note that this integration is not valid when n=m, since it involves a division by zero. in the n=m case, i have:
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\sin^2\frac{2\pi nt}{T}\! dt\\<br /> =\frac{1}{2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}dt-\frac{1}{2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\cos\frac{4\pi nt}{T}dt\\<br /> =T/2<br /> \end{align}<br />

so, now, armed with these integrals, we can do the problem.

i am going to rename the dummy index n, in the infinite summation to m. you will see why.
<br /> f(t) = \sum_m^\infty b_m \sin\frac{2\pi mt}{T}<br />

then


\begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} f(t) \sin{n \omega t}\ dt &amp;= \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} \left[ \sum_m^\infty b_m \sin\frac{2\pi mt}{T}\right] \sin\frac{2\pi nt}{T}dt\\<br /> &amp;= \sum_m^\infty b_m\int_{-T/2}^{T/2} \sin\frac{2\pi nt}{T}\sin\frac{2\pi mt}{T}\ dt<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />

this summation contains an infinite number of terms, one for every value of m, but only when m=n is the term nonzero, so i will drop the summation, and change m to n, so i am only considering one integral, and the value of that integral is T/2. this is the only nonzero term of the infinite summation.

<br /> \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} f(t) \sin{n \omega t}\ dt =\frac{T}{2}b_n<br />
or
<br /> b_n=\frac{2}{T}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2} f(t) \sin{n \omega t}\ dt<br />

and that s it. any questions?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top