Proving the Identity to Demonstrating Finite Orthonormal Bases

franklampard8
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How do I prove that

Ʃ\ket{ei} \bra{ei} = I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
franklampard8 said:
How do I prove that
<br /> \def\&lt;{\langle}<br /> \def\&gt;{\rangle}<br /> \sum_i |e_i\&gt;\&lt;e_i| ~=~ 1<br />

It depends on the context, and precisely what your e_i stand for.

As a general suggestion, start by looking up the "spectral theorem" in a linear algebra textbook. (Wikipedia gives an overview, though not the details.)
 
strangerep said:
It depends on the context, and precisely what your e_i stand for.

As a general suggestion, start by looking up the "spectral theorem" in a linear algebra textbook. (Wikipedia gives an overview, though not the details.)

e_i refers to a finite orthonormal basis
 
franklampard8 said:
e_i refers to a finite orthonormal basis

OK, so if you write out how an arbitrary vector \psi is expressed in terms of that orthonormal basis, the desired answer should then follow almost immediately.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top