Proving the Inclusion of Elements of Finite Commutative p-Groups in A(p)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmycricket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that all elements of the group A = A(p) × A', where A(p) is a finite abelian p-group and A' is a finite abelian group whose order is not divisible by p, belong to A(p) if their orders are p^k for k ≥ 0. The participants emphasize that since the order of A' does not include p, any element of A' cannot have an order divisible by p^k. The proof hinges on the identities of A(p) and A' and the implications of element orders within the group structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite abelian groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with group orders and element orders in group theory
  • Knowledge of isomorphism concepts in group theory
  • Basic principles of commutativity in algebraic structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure and properties of finite abelian p-groups
  • Explore the implications of group orders in the context of direct products
  • Learn about isomorphisms and their applications in group theory
  • Investigate the differences between commutative and abelian terminology in algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, algebra students, and anyone interested in the properties of finite abelian groups and their applications in higher mathematics.

jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Let A = A(p)\times A' where A(p) is a finite commutative p-group (i.e the group has order p^a for p prime and a>0) and A' is a finite commutative group whose order is not divisible by p.
Prove that all elements of A of orders p^k, k\geq0 belong to A(p)


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know where to begin with this. I am quite sure that if the order of A' is not divisible by p then the order of any element of A' is not divisible by p^k. Is this usefull or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##e_1, e_2## denote the identities of ##A(p)## and ##A'## respectively.

If ##(a_1, a_2) \in A##, ##(a_1, a_2) = (e_1, e_2)## iff ##a_1 = e_1## and ##a_2 = e_2##.

Suppose ##(a_1, a_2)## has order ##p^k## for some ##k > 0##. Then it must be that

##a_1^{p^k} = e_1## and ##a_2^{p^k} = e_2##.

But then the order of ##a_2## divides ##p^k##. So the order of ##a_2## is ##p^m## for some m. This is a problem if ##a_2 \neq e_2##.

Note that in the statement of the problem, they regard ##A(p)## as a subgroup of ##A##. But to be proper, ##A(p)## is isomorphic to the subgroup ##A(p) \times \{e_2 \}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Also, in group theory, people tend to stay away from using the word commutative. Instead you should use abelian. The reason for this is that it is nice to have separate words for commuting in multiplication and commuting in addition when you get to ring theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K