Proving the Isomorphism Property of the Spinor Map in SL(2,C) and SO(3,1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
In the context of the homomorphism between SL(2,C) and SO(3,1), I have that

\textbf{x}=\overline{\sigma}_{\mu}x^{\mu}

x^{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}tr(\sigma^{\mu}\textbf{x})

give the explicit form of the isomorphism, where \textbf{x} is a 2x2 matrix of SL(2,C) and x^{\mu} a 4-vector of SO(3,1).

Considering the linear map (the spinor map)

\textbf{x}\rightarrow\textbf{x}'=A\textbf{x}A^{\dagger}

one can show that the 4-vectors on the SO(3,1) side are also linearly related by

x'^{\mu}=\phi(A)^{\mu}_{\nu}x^{\nu}

where it is easy to show that

\phi(A)^{\mu}_{\nu}=\frac{1}{2}tr(\sigma^{\mu}A\overline{\sigma}_{\nu}A^{\dagger})

I understand all this, but I want to prove that \phi(AB)=\phi(A)\phi(B). How would I go about doing this? I tried a few things but not very successfully.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't copy paste the proof here, I can only tell you where to find it: Mueller-Kirsten + Wiedemann's <Supersymmetry> (WS, 1987), pages 66 and 67.
 
Thanks a lot dextercioby, the book is really helpful!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top