Proving the Law of Large Numbers & Chebyshev's Theorem

bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Well um, I was wondering...w/o simulation,

How do you prove the Law of Large Numbers?
And what's Chebyshev's Theorem? (somewhere, i heard it was mentioned, but what is it?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Law of Large Numbers:
You will see that this law has two considerations based in convergence of random variables:
Let {Xn: n = 1, 2, 3, ...} be a sequence of random variables, and Sj = Sumation of Xj, from j = 1 to n.

1. Weak Law of Large Numbers.
If a sequence of random variables, {Xn} are uncorrelated and their second moments (second moment is the variance by the Moment Generating function) have a common bound, then (Sn - E[Sn])/n converges to zero in probability.

2. Weak Law of Large Numbers.
If a sequence of random variables, {Xn} are independent and identically distributed and have finite mean m, then (Sn/n) converges to m in probability.

3. Strong Law of Large Numbers.
If a sequence of random variables, {Xn} are uncorrelated and their second moments have a common bound, then (Sn - E[Sn])/n converges to zero almost sure (note why this is stronger than convergence in probability. Remember, convergence almost sure implies convergence in probability).

4. Strong Law of Large Numbers.
If a sequence of random variables, {Xn} are independent and identically distributed and have finite mean m, then (Sn/n) converges to m almost sure.


In other words,
- Weak Law of Large Numbers: the mean of a sequence of random variables converges to the population mean in probability.
- Strong Law of Large Numbers: the mean of a sequence of random variables converges to the population mean almost sure.

Basicly, Chebyshev's Inequality says that 75% of your data would be two times the standard deviation from the mean, and 95% three times.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top