Proving the Limit of x^2sin(1/x) as x Approaches 0 Using Delta-Epsilon Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math_Geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Math_Geek
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


limit as x goes to 0 of x^2 sin(1/x)=0


Homework Equations


Use delta-epsilon proof


The Attempt at a Solution


So |f(x)-L|=|x^2 sin(1/x)|=|x^2||sin(1/x)| and I know that sin(1/x) is bounded by one. I am not sure how to finish because of the x^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
… one step at a time … !

Math_Geek said:
So |f(x)-L| = |x^2 sin(1/x)| = |x^2||sin(1/x)| and I know that sin(1/x) is bounded by one. I am not sure how to finish because of the x^2.

Hi Michelle! :smile:

I can't make out whether you've got the answer or not.

You must practise stating things clearly.

And thinking clearly! One step at a time!

First step: what do you think the limit is?

Second step: why do you think it's that (in layman's terms)?

Third step: put second step into delta-epsilon form.

:smile: … three steps to happiness! … :smile:
Have a go!
 
the limit is 0, I think this because it given, also I know sin(1/x) is bounded by so that leaves x^2, so if I choose my epsilon to be sqrt epsilon. then when you square the x then x^2<epsilon
Right?
 
… oh happiness … !

Math_Geek said:
the limit is 0, I think this because it given, also I know sin(1/x) is bounded by so that leaves x^2, so if I choose my epsilon to be sqrt epsilon. then when you square the x then x^2<epsilon
Right?

Very good! :smile:

hmm … now we've got you thinking clearly, how about writing clearly?

You see … you meant "… my delta to be sqrt epsilon", didn't you?

… and it would be much better if you got into the habit of actually writing "Given any epsilon > 0, then for any x with |x| < √epsilon, |x^2sin(1/x) |≤ x^2 < epsilon; therefore lim(x¬0) = 0", instead of just thinking it! :rolleyes:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top