Proving the Proportionality of a Sum Involving Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Sum
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Prove that \sum_{k=1}^{2n} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) is proportional to n, and find the constant of proportionality. So I have to prove that: \sum_{k=1}^{2n} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) = np where p is the constant of proportionality. So for n =1 we have \sum_{k=1}^{2} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) = 2. In this case, p = \frac{1}{2}. For n =s we have \sum_{k=1}^{2s}(-1)^{k}(2k+1) = -3 + 5 + ... + (-1)^{2s}(4s+1) = ps which we assume to be true. Then for n = s+1 we have \sum_{k=1}^{2s+2} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) = p(s+1) which we want to prove from the case n = s. So \sum_{k=1}^{2s+2}(-1)^{k}(2k+1) = (\sum_{k=1}^{2s} (-1)^{k}(2k+1))+(-1)^{2s+1}(4s+3).

Am I doing this correctly? I am stuck at this part.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out a term in your last equation:

\sum^{2s+2}a_k = \sum^{2s} a_k + a_{2s+1} + a_{2s+2}
 
So that means \sum_{k=1}^{2n+2} = (\sum_{k=1}^{2s} a_{k}) + a_{2n+1}+a_{2n+2} = ps + (-1)^{2n+1}(4n+3) + (-1)^{2s+2}(4s+5) = ps-4n-3 + 4s + 5 = ps + 2. So ps+2 = ps + p so does that mean p = 2?

Thanks
 
Yes, p = 2, not 1 / 2. This part is wrong.
courtrigrad said:
So for n =1 we have \sum_{k=1}^{2} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) = 2. In this case, p = \frac{1}{2}
\sum_{k=1}^{2} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) = 2 = np = 1 \times p = p
So p = 2.
:)
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top