Proving the Summation Problem: P(x) and the Limit of |e^(x-1)-1| for x>0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if |P(x)| is bounded by |e^(x-1)-1| for all x > 0, then the sum of the coefficients weighted by their indices, |∑(r*a_r)|, is less than or equal to 1. It is established that P(1) must equal zero, leading to the conclusion that the sum of the coefficients a_0, a_1, and a_2 must be less than or equal to 1. The derivative P'(1) is expressed as the weighted sum of coefficients, which is equal to a_1 + 2a_2 + 3a_3 + ... The derivative of e^(x-1)-1 at x=1 is determined to be 1, indicating that P'(1) must lie between -1 and 1. This supports the assertion that |∑(r*a_r)| is indeed less than or equal to 1.
AdityaDev
Messages
527
Reaction score
33

Homework Statement


If ##|P(x)|<=|e^{x-1}-1|## for all x> 0 where ##P(x)=\sum\limits_{r=0}^na_rx^r## then prove that ##|\sum\limits_{r=0}^nra_r|<=1##

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



##P(1)=a_0+a_1+...##
If the constants are positive, then ##P(1)<=|e^0-1|##
So P(1)<=0
so ##a_0+a_1+a_2+... <=1##
But how do I prove that ##0a_0+1.a_1+2.a_2+...<=1##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AdityaDev said:

Homework Statement


If ##|P(x)|<=|e^{x-1}-1|## for all x> 0 where ##P(x)=\sum\limits_{r=0}^na_rx^r## then prove that ##|\sum\limits_{r=0}^nra_r|<=1##

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



##P(1)=a_0+a_1+...##
If the constants are positive, then ##P(1)<=|e^0-1|##
So P(1)<=0
so ##a_0+a_1+a_2+... <=1##
But how do I prove that ##0a_0+1.a_1+2.a_2+...<=1##

Uh, ##P(1)=0##. Say why that's true. Then you want to show ##|P'(1)| \le 1##. Think about considering what the derivative of ##e^{x-1}-1## at ##x=1## might tell you about that.
 
  • Like
Likes AdityaDev
|P(1)|<=0. So the only possibility for P(1) is zero.
P'(1)=a1+2a2+3a3+...
Derivative of ##e^{x-1}-1## at x=1 is 1. So P'(1) lies between 1 and -1.
 
Back
Top