Proving the Surjectivity of Maps in Cyclic Groups with Relatively Prime Integers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flying_Goat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic Groups
Flying_Goat
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a cyclic group of order n and let k be an integer relatively prime to n. Prove that the map x\mapsto x^k is sujective.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to prove the contrapositon but I am not sure about one thing: If the map is not surjective, does it necessarily mean that there exists distinct i,j \in \{1,...n\} such that (x^i)^k=(x^j)^k? If so how would you prove it?

Anyway here is my proof:

Suppose that the map is not surjective. Then there exists distinct i,j \in \{1,...n\} such that (x^i)^k=(x^j)^k. Without loss of generality suppose i>j. Using the cancellation laws we get x^{(i-j)k}=1. Since |x|=n, it follows that n|(i-j)k (By another proposition). If gcd(n,k)=1 then n|(i-j), a contradiction since (i-j) < n. Hence we must have gcd(n,k) \not= 1 and so k is not relatively prime to n. Therefore by contraposition, if k is relatively prime to n then x\mapsto x^k is surjective.

Quite often I find it hard to check whether a proof has flaws in it. How can I improve on checking for flaws in a proof?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proof looks fine to me. If your group is cyclic and x is a generator then your group is G={x^0,x^1,...x^(n-1)}. So, yes, if x->x^k is not surjective then two of those elements must map to the same thing. Hence (x^i)^k=(x^j)^k for some i and j less than n. Sometimes putting real numbers in for n and k helps to check, e.g. put n=6. Show the map is surjective if k=5 and not surjective if k=4 by writing all of the elements out. It should give you a feeling for what's going on if the proof itself isn't giving you that.
 
Thanks for the reply Dick.

So the image of the map is a subset of G, that is why if the map is not surjective then two elements must map to the same thing. Is that correct?
 
Flying_Goat said:
Thanks for the reply Dick.

So the image of the map is a subset of G, that is why if the map is not surjective then two elements must map to the same thing. Is that correct?

Sure. If x is in G, then x^k is in G. Groups are closed under the operation.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top