Proving the Vacuum Field Equations are Trivial for n=3

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the vacuum field equations in three dimensions, specifically addressing the implications of the vanishing of the Riemann tensor and the Einstein tensor. Participants explore the nature of solutions in the context of a cosmological constant and the relationship between the Riemann and Ricci tensors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to prove that the vanishing of the Riemann tensor leads to only trivial solutions for the vacuum equations in three dimensions, but encounters a non-zero result in their calculations.
  • Another participant suggests that the original claim should refer to the vanishing of the Einstein tensor rather than the Riemann tensor.
  • It is noted that in the presence of a non-zero cosmological constant, the "trivial solution" may not correspond to flat space, but rather to de Sitter or anti-de Sitter spaces.
  • A later reply points out that the statement about the relationship between the Riemann and Ricci tensors is contingent on the cosmological constant being zero, and that introducing a non-zero cosmological constant alters the implications of the vacuum equations.
  • References to various texts are made to support claims regarding the nature of gravitational waves and the implications of the vacuum equations in three dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the vacuum equations in three dimensions, particularly regarding the role of the cosmological constant and the definitions of trivial solutions. There is no consensus on the correctness of the initial claim or the implications of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the implications of the vacuum equations, particularly in relation to the definitions of trivial solutions and the effects of a non-zero cosmological constant. The relationship between the Riemann and Ricci tensors is also noted to be dependent on specific conditions.

Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I am trying to prove a concept that was presented in my course but I am having a bit of an issue with understanding the final result. The concept was that in 3 dimension the vanishing of the Riemann tensor leaves only the trivial solution for the vacuum equations. I started by subbing Eq.(1) into Eq.(2) and solving for R (I took the trace in case you were wondering - my result was 6[itex]\Lambda[/itex]) and then subbed then this answer back into solve for [itex]R_{\alpha\beta}[/itex] (answer was 2[itex]\Lambda[/itex][itex]g_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]). I then subbed both of these into (3) and solved. However, as you can see my answer is not zero. If anyone could point out a mistake or if I just haven't properly conceptualized the answer I would appreciate the help, thanks.

(1) [itex]G_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]=[itex]R_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]g_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]R

(2) [itex]G_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]+[itex]\Lambda[/itex][itex]g_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]=0

(3) [itex]R_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}[/itex] = [itex]g_{\alpha\gamma}[/itex][itex]R_{\beta\delta}[/itex]+[itex]g_{\beta\delta}[/itex][itex]R_{\alpha\gamma}[/itex]-[itex]g_{\alpha\delta}[/itex][itex]R_{\beta\gamma}[/itex]-[itex]g_{\beta\gamma}[/itex][itex]R_{\alpha\delta}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{R}{2}[/itex]([itex]g_{\alpha\gamma}[/itex][itex]g_{\beta\delta}[/itex]-[itex]g_{\alpha\delta}[/itex][itex]g_{\beta\gamma}[/itex])

= [itex]\Lambda[/itex]([itex]g_{\alpha\gamma}[/itex][itex]g_{\beta\delta}[/itex]-[itex]g_{\alpha\delta}[/itex][itex]g_{\beta\gamma}[/itex])
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Airsteve0 said:
in 3 dimension the vanishing of the Riemann tensor leaves only the trivial solution for the vacuum equations.

I assume you mean "vanishing of the Einstein tensor", not the Riemann tensor.

= [itex]\Lambda[/itex]([itex]g_{\alpha\gamma}[/itex][itex]g_{\beta\delta}[/itex]-[itex]g_{\alpha\delta}[/itex][itex]g_{\beta\gamma}[/itex])

In the presence of a non-zero cosmological constant, the "trivial solution" is not flat space; it is de Sitter (positive lambda) or anti-de Sitter (negative lambda) space.

Also, I'm not sure the statement you are trying to prove is true in the case of nonzero lambda. The BTZ black hole is not trivial, for example.
 
yes, sorry I did mean the Einstein tensor
 
I think the statement is that in three dimensions the riemann and ricci tensor have an equal amount of components, see e.g. Carroll's notes. That means that the vacuum equations with Lamda=0, namely that the ricci tensor vanishes, imply that the riemann tensor vanishes. This is also clear from your expressions. Hence no gravitational waves. See e.g. Carlip's book or notes on 2+1 gravity, or Nakahara. Things change when you introduce a Lamda, which is also clear from your expressions. The vacuum equations then no longet imply that the ricci tensor vanishes, but that it is proportional to the metric.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K