Proving Uniform Continuity for f+g on X

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the sum of two uniformly continuous functions, f and g, is also uniformly continuous on a set X. Participants are exploring the properties of uniform continuity and its implications for function addition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant attempts to show that f+g is Lipschitz to establish uniform continuity, while another suggests focusing on the properties of uniform continuity directly. There are discussions about defining epsilon and delta in the context of the problem, and concerns about rigor in mathematical writing.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to the problem, with some participants providing insights into the reasoning behind uniform continuity. However, there is no explicit consensus on a single method, and there are reminders about adhering to forum rules regarding the sharing of complete solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of not providing complete answers in accordance with forum guidelines, which may affect how they express their reasoning and attempts.

CarmineCortez
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




if f and g are 2 uniformly continuous functions on X --> R

show that f+g is uniformly continuous on X



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried showing that f+g is Lipschitz because all Lipschitz functions are uniformly continuous.

So i end up with d(x_1,x_2) < delta then d([f(x1)+g(x1)],[f(x2)+g(x2)])<epsilon. how can I show this is lipshcitz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
forget about lipschitz

you know that if you pick x1 and x2 close to each other, then fx1 and fx2 are at most a distance close to each other, namely epsilon. And also gx1 and gx2 are at most a distance epsilon. so their summed distance is 2 *epsilon.

so now you can define epsilon' as 2epsilon... so for any distance delta between x1 and x2 you now have a distance epsilon' between f+gx1 and f+gx2, that upholds that "for any epsilon' >0 there is a delta >0 such that the distance between x1 and x2 <delta implies that the distance between f+gx1 and f+gx2 is smaller than epsilon' "... it's just the same delta as before.

or at least that's what I make of it. It's 1 AM here and I can't finish my own problem so I went to look at other peoples' problems... but I don't have a clear mind right now.

Oh yeah, and when you write this down... you'll want to use nice math symbols and make things a bit more rigorous... but I think that should be no problem.
 
Last edited:
Let e>0 be given. Since f(x) is uniformly continuous on X, there exists s > 0, such that y in neighborhood of x, N_s (x), implies |f(y)-f(x)| < e/2. Similarly, since g(x) uniformly continuous, y in N_s (x) implies |g(y) - g(x)| < e/2. Since |f(y)+g(y) - f(x)-g(x)| <= |f(y) - f(x)| + |g(y) - g(x)| < e/2 + e/2, we have |(f+g)(y) - (f+g)(x)| < e, for all y in N_s (x). That is (f+g) uniformly continuous, this completes the proof.
 
I don't think we're supposed to write out the entire answer like that
 
jacobrhcp said:
I don't think we're supposed to write out the entire answer like that

VERY DEFINITELY NOT. It's against the forum rules. "Under no circumstances should complete solutions be provided to a questioner, whether or not an attempt has been made." Don't do that again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K