Proving W is a Subspace of P_3 & Finding a Vector Not in W

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hiche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Hiche
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Let W = \{ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d : b + c + d = 0\} and P_3 be the set of all polynomials of degrees 3 or less.

So say we want to prove the W is a subspace of P_3. We let p(x) = a_1x^3 + a_2x^2 + a_3x + a_4 and g(x) = b_1x^3 + b_2x^2 + b_3x + b_4. So, we compute f(x) + kg(x) and the answer should be a polynomial of third degree or less? Is this enough?

And to find a basis for the subspace, we let b = -c - d and just replace into the polynomial and form a basis. How can we find a vector in P_3 but not in the subspace W?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hiche said:
Let W = \{ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d : b + c + d = 0\} and P_3 be the set of all polynomials of degrees 3 or less.

So say we want to prove the W is a subspace of P_3. We let p(x) = a_1x^3 + a_2x^2 + a_3x + a_4 and g(x) = b_1x^3 + b_2x^2 + b_3x + b_4. So, we compute f(x) + kg(x) and the answer should be a polynomial of third degree or less? Is this enough?
No, that would just show that P_3 is a vector space itself. You have said nothing about W! To show that W is a subspace you need to show that if p(x) and q(x) are both members of W, then p+ kq, for any number k, is also a member of W. That is, you must have a_2+ a_3+ a_4= 0, b_2+ b_3+ b_4= 0, and then show that the corresponding coefficients for p+ kq also sum to 0.

And to find a basis for the subspace, we let b = -c - d and just replace into the polynomial and form a basis.
Yes, any "vector" in W can be written ax^3+ (-c-d)x^2+ cx+ d= ax^3+ c(x- x^2)+ d(1- x^2) so that \{x^3, x-x^2, 1- x^2\} is a basis.

How can we find a vector in P_3 but not in the subspace W?
Choose any numbers, a, b, c, d so that b+ c+ d is NOT equal to 0 and ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d will be in P_3 but not in W.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top