Proving <x^2> for Harmonic Oscillator w/ Hermite's Gen Fcn

  • Thread starter Thread starter rafaelpol
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the expectation value for a harmonic oscillator using Hermite's generating function. The key equation derived is = (2n + 1)/2, with all constants set to 1. The integral involved is expressed as an integral of x^2*exp(-x^2)*[Hn(x)]^2, leading to a discrepancy in the expected result of (4n + 1)/2 instead of (2n + 1)/2. The user seeks assistance in identifying the error in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic oscillators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hermite polynomials and their generating functions
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, specifically Gaussian integrals
  • Experience with recursion relations in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of Hermite polynomials and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Study Gaussian integrals and their role in evaluating expectation values
  • Learn about recursion relations for Hermite polynomials
  • Explore common mistakes in integral calculus related to variable substitutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying harmonic oscillators and mathematical methods in physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Hermite polynomials and expectation values in quantum systems.

rafaelpol
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that <x^2> for an harmonic oscillator = (1+2n)/2 (all other constants were taken to be = to 1) using the Hermite's generating function.

Homework Equations



<x^2> = an integral of exp(-x^2)*x^2*[Hn(x)]^2 = (2n+1)/2 (all constants are taken to be equal to 1)


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the standard way of multiplying the generating function by x^2 and exp(-x^2). Then, I took the integral. I had: integral of x^2*exp(-x^2 - 2z^2 + 4xz)dx = sum of z^(2n)/(n!)^2 * integral of x^2*exp(-x^2)*[Hn(x)]^2dx. So the only thing that remained to do was to calculate the integral of x^2*exp(-x^2 - 2z^2 + 4xz)dx from -infinity to +infinity. This integral is easily done by multiplying it by exp(2z^2) and writing it as integral of x^2*exp(-(x-2z)^2). By changing variables from x-2z = u, three integrals remain: integral of u^2*exp(-u^2)du + 4z^2*integral of exp(-u^2)du and the other one will vanish because the integrand is odd. By doing the integrations I obtain Exp(2z^2)*((Pi^0.5)*0.5 + 4z^2*Pi^0.5). Expanding the exponential and making this solution equal to sum of z^(2n)/(n!)^2 * integral of x^2*exp(-x^2)*[Hn(x)]^2dx, and taking the coefficients of the same power in z, I obtain as a final results (4n+1)/2 instead of (2n+1)/2 (which I am able to obtain using recursion relations). I have already tried to look for mistakes in the development of the solution, but I really cannot find. Everything seems completely all right to me, except for the result. The 2n in 2n +1/2 is a consequence of the 4z1^2 in the integral of exp(-x^2) which comes from completing the square in the initial integration, so I cannot see where this is wrong, although i am 100% sure there is something wrong.

I would be extremely thankful if someone could help me.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rafaelpol said:
I tried the standard way of multiplying the generating function by x^2 and exp(-x^2). Then, I took the integral. I had: integral of x^2*exp(-x^2 - 2z^2 + 4xz)dx = sum of z^(2n)/(n!)^2 * integral of x^2*exp(-x^2)*[Hn(x)]^2dx.

Careful,

[tex]\begin{aligned}\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^n}{n!}H_n(x)\right)^2 &= \sum_{n,m=0}^\infty \frac{z^{n+m}}{n!m!}H_n(x)H_m(x) \\ &= \frac{z^{2n}}{(n!)^2}\left[H_n(x)\right]^2+\sum_{\stackrel{n,m=0}{n\neq m}}^\infty \frac{z^{n+m}}{n!m!}H_n(x)H_m(x) \\ &\neq \frac{z^{2n}}{(n!)^2}\left[H_n(x)\right]^2\end{aligned}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K