Proving y' = 2ax + b is a Bijection

  • Thread starter Thread starter soopo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivative of the function y = (1/2)ax² + bx, represented as y' = 2ax + b, is proven to be a bijection under the condition that a ≠ 0. The discussion clarifies that y' is a linear mapping from ℝ to ℝ, establishing both injective and surjective properties. The injective property is validated through algebraic manipulation, confirming that if f(x) = f(y), then x = y. The surjective property is established by demonstrating that for any real number y, there exists an x such that f(x) = y.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Knowledge of linear mappings and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of injection and surjection
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bijective functions in detail
  • Learn about the implications of linear mappings in higher dimensions
  • Explore the conditions under which a function is a bijection
  • Investigate the role of the derivative in determining function behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and function theory, as well as anyone interested in understanding the properties of derivatives and their implications in real analysis.

soopo
Messages
222
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the derivate of y = \frac {1} {2} ax^{2} + bx is a bijection, when a, b, x \in \Re

The Attempt at a Solution


y' = 2ax + b is a linear mapping, where a, b, x \in \Re.
The mapping is \Re \rightarrow \Re.

The mapping is an injection as each element in the domain maps to codomain.
The mappning is a surjection as elements in the domain maps all elements in the
codomain.
(I am not sure about the proofs for the injection and surjection)

Thus, the derivate is bijection, since it is an injection and surjection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
soopo said:

Homework Statement


Prove that the derivate of y = \frac {1} {2} ax^{2} + bx is a bijection, when a, b, x \in \Re

The Attempt at a Solution


y' = 2ax + b is a linear mapping, where a, b, x \in \Re.
The mapping is \Re \rightarrow \Re.

The mapping is an injection as each element in the domain maps to codomain.
No, that's the definition of "function". In order to be an injection, each distinct member of the domain must map to a distinct member of the codomain: if x\ne y then f(x)\ne f(y). That is the same as saying, "if f(x)= f(y) then x= y".

The mappning is a surjection as elements in the domain maps all elements in the
codomain.
(I am not sure about the proofs for the injection and surjection)

Thus, the derivate is bijection, since it is an injection and surjection.
Prove:
injection: if f(x)= f(y) (that is 2ax+ b= 2ay+ b) then x= y. That's simple algebraic manipulation.
surjection: Given any real number y, there exist x such that f(x)= y. If f(x)=2ax+ b= y. If you can solve for x, it certainly exists!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Prove:
injection: if f(x)= f(y) (that is 2ax+ b= 2ay+ b) then x= y. That's simple algebraic manipulation.
surjection: Given any real number y, there exist x such that f(x)= y. If f(x)=2ax+ b= y. If you can solve for x, it certainly exists!

Thank you!
So the point is for injection that each element in the domain equals the one in codomain. For intstance, f(x) = f(y), then x = y.
In contrast to surjection, there is any real number y such that f(x) = y. This gives f(x) = 2ax + b = y. The bottom line is that if you can solve for all x, a surjection exists.
 
soopo said:
Thank you!
So the point is for injection that each element in the domain equals the one in codomain. For intstance, f(x) = f(y), then x = y.
In contrast to surjection, there is any real number y such that f(x) = y. This gives f(x) = 2ax + b = y. The bottom line is that if you can solve for all x, a surjection exists.
The "bottom line" is to prove for all y there is such and x.
Here, of course, if y is any number and y= ax+ b, then ax= y- b so x= (y-b)/a.

Notice, by the way, that your original problem:
Prove that the derivate of y = \frac {1} {2} ax^{2} + bx
is a bijection, when a, b, x \in \Re
is imposible (because it's not true) unless you put an additional condition on a!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K