Proving Zero Vectors for A, B, and C

  • Thread starter HKP
  • Start date
In summary: So you would first need to create the matrix A, and then row-reduce the matrix to get the equation rA + sB + tC = 0.
  • #1
HKP
4
0

Homework Statement


A= [1 1 -1], B=[0 1 2], C=[3 0 1]

Show that r=s=t=0



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I said r=s=t=0
so

0[ 1 1 -1] + 0[0 1 2] + 0[3 0 1] so
0 + 0 + 0= 0
so rA + sB + tC = 0 and r=s=t=0

Is that right way to do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is that the right way to do what? You title is misleading; it is apparently not a matrix (there is no such word as "matrice" in English) problem, but a problem about vectors.

Are you trying to show that the vectors are linearly independent? If so, you have to show that the equation rA + sB + tC = 0 has only one solution for the constants r, s, and t. The equation rA + sB + tC = 0 always has what is sometimes called the trivial solution (namely r = s = t = 0). Your job is to show that there are no other solutions for these constants.
 
  • #3
Could you please help me on how to start the problem because I don't know how to prove it only has one solution etc..
 
  • #4
Write the vectors as columns in a matrix, and then row-reduce the matrix. If you end up with three nonzero rows (three rows, each with a nonzero leading entry), then that means that the only solution is r = 0, s = 0, t = 0, and there are no other solutions.

If you end up with one or more rows that have all zeros, then there are multiple solutions.

To help you understand what is going on here, think back to we're trying to do, namely find all solutions of the equation rA + sB + tC = 0. Try to picture this equation with the vectors A, B, and C written in vertical form.

The preceding equation can be written as matrix equation that looks like this:
[A B C][r s t]^T = [0] (Note: [r s t]^T is a column vector)

This matrix equation can be written as an augmented matrix like so:
[1 0 3 | 0]
[1 1 0 | 0]
[-1 2 1 | 0]

Row reduce this matrix as described at the beginning of this post.

Is that enough for you to start in on?
 
  • #5
Mark44 said:
Is that the right way to do what? You title is misleading; it is apparently not a matrix (there is no such word as "matrice" in English) problem, but a problem about vectors.

Err. . . vectors are an 1 x n (row) or n x 1 (column) matrix. . .
 
  • #6
descendency said:
Err. . . vectors are an 1 x n (row) or n x 1 (column) matrix. . .
True enough.
 

Related to Proving Zero Vectors for A, B, and C

1. What does it mean to prove r=s=t=0 for A, B & C?

Proving r=s=t=0 for A, B & C means that for the given variables A, B, and C, the values of r, s, and t are all equal to 0. This can be done through various mathematical methods and techniques.

2. Why is it important to prove r=s=t=0 for A, B & C?

Proving r=s=t=0 for A, B & C is important in order to understand the relationship between these variables and to identify any patterns or connections that may exist. It can also help in solving equations and making predictions.

3. How can you prove r=s=t=0 for A, B & C?

There are several ways to prove r=s=t=0 for A, B & C. One method is to substitute the values of A, B, and C into an equation and show that the resulting values of r, s, and t are all equal to 0. Another method is to use algebraic manipulation to simplify an equation and show that the coefficients of r, s, and t are all equal to 0.

4. What are the implications of proving r=s=t=0 for A, B & C?

The implications of proving r=s=t=0 for A, B & C can vary depending on the specific context in which it is being used. In general, it can help in understanding the behavior of these variables and can be used to make predictions or solve problems related to them.

5. Can r=s=t=0 for A, B & C be proven in all cases?

No, it may not always be possible to prove r=s=t=0 for A, B & C in all cases. There may be certain constraints or limitations that prevent all three variables from being equal to 0 simultaneously. It is important to carefully consider the context and specific conditions when attempting to prove this relationship.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
913
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
478
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
739
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
538
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
389
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
549
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
487
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
758
Replies
4
Views
575
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
253
Back
Top