Publication, but I didnt do anything?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluffy123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Publication
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate researcher who feels undeserving of co-authorship on a paper submitted by their professor, despite having written essential computer programs for the project. Participants emphasize that it is common for undergraduates to be included as co-authors when they make significant contributions, even if those contributions are not groundbreaking ideas. They suggest that the professor likely recognized the importance of the student's work and that the student should express gratitude while continuing to engage in the research. Concerns about authorship responsibilities are raised, highlighting that co-authors should be prepared to discuss the paper's content and implications in future academic settings. Overall, the conversation reassures the student that their contributions are valuable and that co-authorship can enhance their academic profile.
fluffy123
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I started doing research with a professor back in September, and basically all I've done so far was write a bunch of computer programs. He submitted a paper for publication last week, and he put me as a co-author. But it doesn't feel right, because I don't think I deserve it.

Just curious, does this normally happen for undergrad researchers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's up to him, really. Apparently, he valued your contributions. Just thank him and keep working.
 
turbo said:
It's up to him, really. Apparently, he valued your contributions. Just thank him and keep working.

^ this, and writing programs that were necessary to get the work done is a considerable contribution
 
fluffy123 said:
Hi all,

I started doing research with a professor back in September, and basically all I've done so far was write a bunch of computer programs. He submitted a paper for publication last week, and he put me as a co-author. But it doesn't feel right, because I don't think I deserve it.

Just curious, does this normally happen for undergrad researchers?

There's nothing wrong with talking to the professor about your concerns- presumably he didn't get your permission to add your name to the paper. Most likely, he thought he was acting correctly and that you would be excited.
 
Research projects can die when people write software that doesn't work, or is too inefficient to get the job finished on time. Maybe you didn't come up with any "big new ideas", but don't undervalue what you did contribute. Nothing much gets achieved (either in research or anything else) unless somebody does the grunt work, and does it right!
 
The pragmatic aspects are a big part of actually following through with an experiment. If you were instrumental in getting the experiment off the ground, then you certainly earned your place on the paper.
 
What do you think you need to have done to deserve to be named as an author?

Sometimes the lines between who qualifies and who doesn't can be a little blurry. You need to have contributed significantly to the work in some way - but "significant" can sometimes be difficult to define. What can be annyoing for students who volunteer their time to assist with research is that for the same work in, some can end up on papers and others may not.

It's tempting to tell you to just accept it and move on, that having this publication to your name will only help you. But as an author, you are also assuming some of the responsibility for what you publish. You never know when you'll get an email from someone who read the paper and wants to discuss aspects of it with you. Or if you'll be asked about the details when you visit a graduate school you're interested in.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top