Pulleys & Masses: Instantaneous Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter struggles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving pulleys and masses, specifically focusing on the instantaneous acceleration of a mass in a system where the string has mass. The original poster presents equations related to the forces acting on the masses and the string, seeking clarification on the derivation of one particular equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the equation relating the forces on the string and the acceleration of the system. Questions arise regarding the validity of the original poster's equations and the assumptions made about the forces acting on the string.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the reasoning behind the equations presented. Some have offered insights into the force balance on the string, while others are questioning the consistency of definitions and the implications of the terms used in the equations. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the tension in the string and the distribution of mass along its length. The original poster's equations and the responses indicate a need for careful consideration of the forces involved and the setup of the problem.

struggles
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider now the case where the string of length l has mass per length λ ̸= 0. Show that the instantaneous acceleration of m2 is given by a2 = (m1 −m2)+2x0λg/(M + m1 + m2)
where M = λ l is the total mass of the string and find the tension in both ends of the string. (please see picture!)
Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 17.12.43.png

Homework Equations


I have the solution and it starts off with three equations
T2 - m2g = m2a
T1 - m1g = -m1a
T1 + 2x0λg - T2 = Ma2

Although i completely understand where the first two come from I'm a little confused my the last one. Although i get that it is supposed to show the force on the string, I can't figure out how the left hand side is true. IF someone could please explain where this equation came from that would be much appreciated.

Also when i was attempting this problem before seeing the solution i came up with two equations:
T1- m1g - (l/2 + x0)λg = m1a and the equivalent for the second mass. Would these also be correct?

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 17.12.43.png
    Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 17.12.43.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
struggles said:
T1 + 2x0λg - T2 = Ma2

Although i completely understand where the first two come from I'm a little confused my the last one. Although i get that it is supposed to show the force on the string, I can't figure out how the left hand side is true. IF someone could please explain where this equation came from that would be much appreciated.
The trailing sub-2 on the Ma appears to be a typo. There is only one acceleration, a.

Do a force balance on the string. We have downward force on the one end, T1. We have downward force on the other end, T2. Those two subtract as shown. We have downward force on the string where it hangs over the pulley on the one side down to the position of m2. And an identical force on the other side. Those two cancel. We have an extra length of 2x0 of string on the left hand side. The force from gravity on that segment that contributes a term. Sum those up and set it to the acceleration of the string as a whole and you get the equation as shown.
 
struggles said:
as attempting this problem before seeing the solution i came up with two equations:
T1- m1g - (l/2 + x0)λg = m1a and the equivalent for the second mass. Would these also be correct?
No. I suspect you are not being consistent in your definition of T1 to arrive at that. Also, the l/2 term is problematic however you define the tension, since some of the l/2+x0 is not vertical.
 
======================
JB444 has made my initial bit redundant, but
i came up with two equations:
T1- m1g - (l/2 + x0)λg = m1a and the equivalent for the second mass. Would these also be correct?
The (l/2 + x0)λg term represents the weight of half the string plus x0. I can't quite see that myself.
When x0=0, then there is L/2 on each side balancing each other - no net weight in either direction.
When the masses have moved by a finite x0, the string on one side has increased by x0, but the other side has also reduced by x0. The net force due to the weight of string is +x0 -(-x0), as the solution and JB said.
My other doubt about your equation (I'm not sure what your second equivalent one will be) is the directions of T1 and a. Until you either show the direction of a on your diagram, or give the second equation, I can't be sure whether you're wrong or have just changed the direction of a.
 
Thank you all for your help. I think i understand now :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K