Pulsar Angular acceleration question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a pulsar with a rotation period of 0.033 seconds, which is increasing at a rate of 1.26 x 10^(-5) seconds per year. The initial calculation of angular velocity is correct at 190.4 rad/s, but the method for finding angular acceleration was flawed. The correct approach involves determining the change in angular velocity over the time increment of 1.26 x 10^(-5) seconds, and it is crucial to convert the time units from years to seconds squared for accurate results. Ultimately, the angular acceleration is negative, indicating a decrease in angular velocity over time. Understanding these calculations is essential for solving problems related to pulsar dynamics.
ja sam glup
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is as follows. A certain pulsar (a rapidly rotating neutron star) has a period of rotation of 0.033s, and this is observed to be increased at a rate of 1.26(10^(-5)) seconds per year. what is the value of the angular acceleration in rad/s^2?


Homework Equations


w (omega) = 2pi/T. I calculated that to be 190.4.

angular acceleration = change in w / change in t.

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I assumed that the angular acceleration is constant. If this is so, then I should get my answer by calculating the angular velocity at T = 0.033s, and subtracting that calculated value with T= 0.033 + 1.26x10^(-5), and divide that number by 1.26x10^(-5). However, this didn't get me the right answer.

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of angular acceleration is "rate of change of angular velocity over time."

So, I assumed that the angular acceleration is constant. If this is so, then I should get my answer by calculating the angular velocity at T = 0.033s, and subtracting that calculated value with T= 0.033 + 1.26x10^(-5)

True.

But you don't divide the result by 1.26(10^(-5)). You are going to end up with a angular acceleration in rad/year^2. You have to convert those year^2 to sec^2.

EDIT: You have to subtract T=0.033s to T= 0.033 + 1.26x10^(-5) s. So the angular acceleration is negative.


Source:

http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Torque_and_angular_acceleration

(at the very bottom)
 
Last edited:
Ahh yes ok, didn't catch that. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top