Pure Qubit Question: Does Alice Fulfill Bob's Demand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter begyu85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pure Qubit
begyu85
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

One can describe a pure qubit in two ways (onto the bloch-sphere): 1.) one take a (\alpha,\beta) , where \alpha,\beta are complex numbers and \left|\alpha\right|^{2}+\left|\beta\right|^{2}=1. 2.) with a real 3-dimensional unit vector.

Bob wants that Alice generate one million random (\alpha,\beta) qubit to him. Alice generates rather one million real unit vectors and after this she enumerates this unit vectors to (\alpha,\beta) one by one.

My question is: Did Alice fulfill Bob's demand? Are Bob going to accept Bob's qubits..?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did Alice generate those "random" 3D real unit vectors?
How does Bob generate random alpha beta pairs?
I assume you want uniform coverage of the Bloch sphere in both cases.
If so, Bob should not be able to tell the difference.
Just my $.02

Jim Graber
 
Yes, the distribution of the random qubits is uniform...

My first thought was this what you are saying...but is this answer correct? I mean this would be so simple...

In the first case i will get some statistics, and i have to transform to an other one.. Question: does this transformation (between the representation of the qubits) preserve the features of the statistics... ?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top