Put these weights in order from smallest to largest

  • Thread starter Thread starter josie4040
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on ordering metric weights from smallest to largest, specifically cg, mg, kg, g, dg, dag, and km. Participants suggest resources for understanding metric prefixes, including a link to the NIST website and Wikipedia. One user realizes they have the information needed in their notebook. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding reliable information online. Ultimately, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding metric conversions for project work.
josie4040
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
can someone tell me how to put these weights in order from smallest to largest cg mg kg g dg dag km or are these in order? I keep getting foreign web sites when I look it uo. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
josie4040 said:
can someone tell me how to put these weights in order from smallest to largest cg mg kg g dg dag km or are these in order? I keep getting foreign web sites when I look it uo. :)
Do you know how to use the prefixes of the metric system ? Please see http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/ .
 
Not really just need to find this out so I can work on a project that requires some conversion. Looked at your site but need not see some of the units. Anyone else know of a good site please?
 
oop hold the phone doh! its on the inside of my notebook how to do it. How handy! LOL
 
Wikipedia may be helpful. See under 'Multiples' on this page.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top