Puzzle Solving - How to Transform (eqn 1) to (eqn 2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fled143
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around transforming the equation f(x) = f(x1)*f(x-x1) / [ (cot(x1) + cot(x-x1) ] into f(x) = 1 / (sin(x)). Participants express confusion about the transformation process and seek guidance on how to derive the second equation from the first. Clarifications are made regarding the variable x1, which can be any value within the specified range of 0 < x1 < x. The importance of precise mathematical language is emphasized, highlighting that every detail matters in mathematical discussions. Overall, the thread seeks a clear method for solving this mathematical puzzle.
fled143
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am reading an article that shows this equation

(eqn 1) f(x) = f(x1)*f(x-x1) / [ (cot(x1) + cot(x-x1) ]

an it continue that the solution to it is

(eqn 2) f(x) = 1 / (sin(x) ).

I admit that it is indeed easy to show that eqn 2 does fit to eqn 1 but I don't really have idea how to get eqn 2 out of eqn 1. Will anybody share their idea how to do this stuff? This puzzles me because it seems easy but I just don't know how to start it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you check and make sure you wrote this down correctly.

Also, I assume x1 means x_1.

Also, x_1 can be anything I want?

Every detail to a question is important. There is no such thing as text talk in mathematics. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Im sorry for the incomplete information.

0< x_1 < x is the additional restriction.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top