Q&A Interview with Physicist Michio Kaku

AI Thread Summary
Oil production is currently peaking, indicating that half of the Earth's total oil reserves have been depleted, leading to rising oil prices as extraction becomes more difficult. The transition to alternative energy sources is urgent, with wind power emerging as a leading option, especially in Europe. Solar energy, while promising, remains too expensive to compete effectively with fossil fuels at present. The discussion emphasizes the need for advancements in renewable technologies to ensure a sustainable energy future. Overall, a shift away from fossil fuels is critical as their availability declines.
Messages
19,791
Reaction score
10,748
Don’t forget to read Part 1 of this interview.
Professor Kaku, what do you think of “peak oil,” how serious is it? and what alternative sources of energy do you think will best provide the worlds needs in the coming decades after fossil fuels start to decline? (whether it be organic oils, nuclear breeder-types, fusion etc.)
Dr Michio Kaku:
It seems as if oil production is peaking right now. This is called Hubbert’s peak, I recall. This means that 50% of the total oil in the earth has already been taken out. This also means that oil prices will gradually soar as oil becomes harder to extract. As a consequence, I feel that we should be the transition to nonrenewable energy sources fairly soon. The immediate winner, esp. in Europe, is wind power. However, solar electricity is still too high to be commercially competitive with oil and coal. But, with mass productions, increased...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top