[Q]Eigenfunction of inverse opreator and another question.

  • Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Inverse
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of eigenfunction of inverse operators and how it relates to the commutator theorem. It is stated that the eigenfunction of the inverse operator A is the same as the function phi, with eigenvalue 1/a. The conversation also includes a discussion on the application of AA^-1 to a function and the law of association for matrices. The expert summarizer emphasizes that the law of association holds for matrices, and therefore the two expressions A(A^-1f) and (AA^-1)f are equal.
  • #1
good_phy
45
0
Hi.

Do you know eigenfunction of inverse operator, for instance [itex] \hat{A^{-1}} [/itex] given that [itex] \hat{A}\varphi = a\varphi[/itex]

textbook said eigenfunction of inverse operator A is the same as [itex] \varphi [/itex]

which eigenvalue is [itex] \frac{1}{a} [/itex]

Can you prove that?

And is it really that [itex] [A,A^{-1}] = 0 [/itex] so both opreatator have a common
eigenfunction if eigenvalue is not degenerate, this theorem is called commutator theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just operate with A^-1 so you get [tex]A^{-1}A\phi =\phi =a A^{-1}\phi[/tex].
No need to commute A with its inverse.
Then proving the commutator=0 follows.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
The latex doesn't seem to work. The last term is \phi=a A^{-1} \phi.
 
  • #4
I don't understand why [itex] AA^{-1}\varphi = \varphi [/itex] It is absolute true that

[itex] AA^{-1} = 1 [/itex] But applying [itex] AA^{-1} [/itex] to some function is

different matter. for example we assume A and its inverse can be matrix, function f is also matrix.

[itex] A(A^{-1}f) [/itex] is not [itex] (AA^{-1})f [/itex] right?
 
  • #5
Hm, yes, the law of association holds for matrices, so those two last expressions are equal.
 
  • #6
good_phy said:
It is absolute true that

[itex] AA^{-1} = 1 [/itex] But applying [itex] AA^{-1} [/itex] to some function is

different matter.
No, it can't be a different matter. To say that two operators X and Y are equal means that Xf=Yf for all functions f. This is no different from saying that two functions f and g are equal if f(x)=g(x) for all x.
 

What is an eigenfunction?

An eigenfunction is a function that, when multiplied by a specific operator, results in a scalar multiple of itself. It is analogous to an eigenvector in linear algebra.

What is the inverse operator?

The inverse operator is the operator that, when applied to a given function, results in the identity function. It is the "reverse" of the original operator and allows us to "undo" the effects of the original operator.

How do eigenfunctions relate to the inverse operator?

The eigenfunctions of an operator are important because they form a basis for the space on which the operator acts. This means that any function can be represented as a linear combination of eigenfunctions, making it easier to find the inverse operator.

What is the significance of finding the eigenfunctions of the inverse operator?

Finding the eigenfunctions of the inverse operator allows us to understand the structure of the operator and its behavior on different functions. It also helps us to find the inverse operator more easily, which can be useful for solving equations or understanding the behavior of a system.

Are eigenfunctions and eigenvalues the same thing?

No, eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are different concepts. Eigenfunctions are the functions that, when multiplied by an operator, result in a scalar multiple of themselves. Eigenvalues are the corresponding scalar multiples. However, eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are closely related and often work together in mathematical problems.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
15K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
867
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top