Q: Fokker-Planck (Brownian motion) for undergrads?

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks references for teaching a physics undergrad about the mean-squared displacement in Brownian motion, specifically for free diffusion and optical traps. They find existing materials either too advanced or too simplistic, prompting a request for intermediate resources. Suggested references include "Noise and Fluctuations" by MacDonald and a book by Lemons, though the user has not fully reviewed the latter. The user also considers Einstein's original papers for inspiration, despite noting their complexity. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for accessible yet comprehensive educational materials on the topic.
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
7,686
Reaction score
3,761
All,

I'm looking for a reference to help guide one of my students- a motivated physics undergrad. I would like him to work through a derivation of the mean-squared displacement of a particle undergoing free Brownian motion (free diffusion) and then for a particle held in an optical trap.

All of the references I have are graduate-level, and a quick google search turns up either mathematically-oriented derivations:

http://physics.gu.se/~frtbm/joomla/media/mydocs/LennartSjogren/kap7.pdf
http://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~pavl/lec_fokker_planck.pdf

Or documents that merely state the results:

http://faculty.philau.edu/masoodir/PDF/Projects/Thermo/Brownian%20Motion.pdf

Does anyone have a recommendation for something midway between these two extremes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks!
 
"Noise and Fluctuations" by MacDonald is another option:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486450295/?tag=pfamazon01-20

If I recall correctly, it should be readable by an upper division undergrad (but then I read it after grad school so my perspective may be off).

It's been awhile since I've looked at them, but I wonder how readable Einstein's original papers are ... might be inspiring to read the original, perhaps after the basic calculation is understood?

jason

EDIT:

There is also a book by Lemons that I have only flipped through - may be worth a look but I haven't read it:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/080186867X/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks- I'll check those out.

I pulled up Einsten's paper: the result of interest is in section 4, but the reasoning is difficult to follow (the relevant sentence reminds me of the cartoon '...then a miracle occurs"). On the other hand, this looks promising:
http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~klages/people/msc_qirezi.pdf
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top