Q: Limit on a moon's orbital radius due to sun's gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the gravitational limits on a moon's orbital radius due to the sun's influence, referencing a law that describes the relationship between the distances and masses of the sun, planet, and moon. The equation (rp/rm)² = Ms/Mp illustrates when gravitational forces are equal. Participants share insights about the Hill sphere and how moons can orbit at varying distances based on their direction of motion, with simulations provided to visualize these concepts. The conversation also touches on the implications of moon interactions and their relevance to dark matter research. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on the law governing these gravitational dynamics.
Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
Messages
2,517
Reaction score
465
I recently came across a Wikipedia article about somebody's (?) law regarding limits on a moon's orbital radius because the sun's gravitational influence is greater than the planet's at some distance from the planet. As I recall, the law had two different names associated with it. In addition to the obvious relationship (shown below) for the values when the gravitational forces on the moon are equal for the sun and the planet, there was a useful diagram showing this effect together with consideration of the sun's influence on the Lagrangian points, L1 and L2.
(rp/rm)2 = Ms/Mp, where
rp is the distance between sun and planet
rm is the distance planet and moon
Ms is the mass of the sun
Mp is the mass of the planet

Unfortunately I did not take notes, and now I can not find that article. Can anyone help me? Does anyone know a name of this law?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Janus said:
The Hill sphere:
Hi Janus:

Thank you very much for your prompt help.

Regards,
Buzz
 
In a prograde direction, the Moon can be almost twice as far and still orbit the Earth. In a retrograde direction, it can go much farther than that. But in either case, its well short of the Hill Sphere.

Try it yourself. This simulation will run in your web browser. Press [>] on the Time Step interface to play. If the screen gets too cluttered, press C for clear.

http://orbitsimulator.com/gravitySimulatorCloud/simulations/1446088723620_outermost_moons.html

120 objects orbit the Earth in with semi-major axes evenly-spaced between 400,000 - 1,600,000 km. The green ones orbit in a prograde direction. The red ones are retrograde. The blue one is for scale. It orbits at the Moon's distance, but it is massless, so it does not influence the simulation.

The frame is constantly rotated to keep the Sun above the top of the screen, as the phases indicate. So the Earth / L1 is above the Earth, and L2 is below Earth. Particles that escape do so through the L1 and L2 regions.

If the Moon were not massless in this simulation, it would destabilize all prograde orbits external to its own. Some retrograde ones would still exist. To try, press E for edit, and change the Moon's mass to 0.0123 Em (Earth masses). Pause the simulation before making the edit.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
tony873004 said:
This simulation will run in your web browser.
Hi tony:

Thanks for your post.

The simulation page you cited is quite interesting. Although moon-to-moon interactions are not applicable, the simulation is actually more relevant to another thread
than I expected it to be. I get it that retrograde motion of the moon reduces it's velocity around the sun, while prograde increases it.

In the thread I cited above, the"moon" is a DM particle, the "planet" is the sun, and the "sun" is the mass at and near the center of the Milky Way. There I am seeking help exploring how much DM our sun may have gravitationally captured in its orbit around the Milky Way center.

Regards,
Buzz
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top