Q of R+LC Circuit: Understanding Q & Phasor Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter strauser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of an LC tank circuit in series with a resistance R, specifically how the quality factor (Q) appears to increase with R. The user has derived two expressions for Q, one being Q=R√(C/L) and the other Q=R√(C/(L+4R²C)), and seeks clarification on which is correct. There is a consensus that defining Q accurately is crucial, with some noting that the definition can vary based on the context, such as the input and output variables considered. Additionally, the intricacies of Q in parallel circuits are highlighted, emphasizing the relationship between reactance and resistance. The conversation underscores the importance of precise definitions and the complexity of analyzing Q in different circuit configurations.
strauser
Messages
37
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Derive Q of R in parallel with tank circuit
I've been experimenting with an LC tank circuit in series with a resistance R, and I've noted that the Q seems to increase with R. I've tried to derive this result via phasor analysis, but I'm not sure if my expression is correct.

To make things clear, I'm talking about the circuit with impedance ##Z=R+jX_L || X_C=R+j(\dfrac{\omega L}{1-\omega^2 LC}) ##

The only thing I've found via google is this:

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/108788/voltage-output-from-a-tank-circuit

where the first answer suggests that ##Q=R\sqrt{\dfrac{C}{L}}## which at least agrees with my measured results. I've found however that ##Q=R\sqrt{\dfrac{C}{L+4R^2C}}##

So which result, if either, is right? I note that mine approximates the quoted result if ##L \gg 4R^2C##.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
At first you have to convince yourself about the DEFINITION of the quantity you call "Q".
What is your definition?
 
LvW said:
At first you have to convince yourself about the DEFINITION of the quantity you call "Q".
What is your definition?
Well, nothing too unusual: ##Q=\dfrac{\omega_\text{resonance}}{B_\text{3dB}}## where ##B_\text{3dB}## is the 3dB bandwidth.

I find your question a little odd though; aren't all definitions equivalent up to a factor of ##2\pi##. It's been years since I looked at this stuff in detail, but I don't recall any defn that would give a substantially different result. Maybe I forget?
 
Well, may be that my question appears to you "a little odd" - nevertheless, would you mind to tell us HOW you have found the expression for Q you have mentioned?
According to system theory, the Q value of a frequency-dependent netork is defined using the pole position in the compex s-plane - and only for some special cases this value is identical to the ratio "resonant frequency/bandwidth".
More than that, for R approaching infinity your Q expression would be close to Q=0.5.
This is not correct. In contrast, Q must be very large...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes strauser and berkeman
strauser said:
Maybe I forget?
In addition to what LvW said it’s critical to precisely define what is the input and output variable. For example are you looking at voltage or current? Across or through what? Etc.
 
LvW said:
Well, may be that my question appears to you "a little odd" - nevertheless, would you mind to tell us HOW you have found the expression for Q you have mentioned?
According to system theory, the Q value of a frequency-dependent netork is defined using the pole position in the compex s-plane - and only for some special cases this value is identical to the ratio "resonant frequency/bandwidth".
More than that, for R approaching infinity your Q expression would be close to Q=0.5.
This is not correct. In contrast, Q must be very large...
I don't have time to reply to this fully today, but your final observation suggests that I've indeed effed up somewhere.

I'll put up the details tomorrow.
 
strauser said:
Summary: Derive Q of R in parallel with tank circuit

I've been experimenting with an LC tank circuit in series with a resistance R, and I've noted that the Q seems to increase with R. I've tried to derive this result via phasor analysis, but I'm not sure if my expression is correct.

To make things clear, I'm talking about the circuit with impedance ##Z=R+jX_L || X_C=R+j(\dfrac{\omega L}{1-\omega^2 LC}) ##

The only thing I've found via google is this:

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/108788/voltage-output-from-a-tank-circuit
where the first answer suggests that ##Q=R\sqrt{\dfrac{C}{L}}## which at least agrees with my measured results. I've found however that ##Q=R\sqrt{\dfrac{C}{L+4R^2C}}##

So which result, if either, is right? I note that mine approximates the quoted result if ##L \gg 4R^2C##.
If you have L, C and R all in parallel, the Q is approx R/X, where X is the reactance of either L or C, which are the same when Q is greater than about 2. For the case when R, L and C are in series, Q= X/R exactly. The topic is actually a bit intricate for parallel circuits, because max voltage and zero phase do not quite coincide for low Q values. It is covered in the very old book Radio Engineering, by Terman.
 
Back
Top