QFT Charges & Gauge Group Root Lattices Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter wilcherrera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
wilcherrera
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi...I do not understand why the charges of a QFT belong to the root lattice of the gauge group...can somebody explain it please??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you mean.

The charges are the q.m. generators of the gauge group. Look at a simple example, the n-dim. harmonic oscillator with

a_i;\;i=1\ldotsN

[T^a, T^b] = if^{abc}T^c

If you define the charges (in an SU(N) gauge theory you can derive them from the Noether theorem instead of introducing them by hand)

Q^a = a^\dagger_i (T^a)_{ik} a_k

you can check easily that they generate the same algebra.

[Q^a, Q^b] = if^{abc}Q^c

Therefore you can classify all states according to the su(N) algebra and all equations that are valid on the algebraic level carry over to the q.m. states.

Quantum gauge theory gives you additional equations, e.g. the requirements that in an unbroken SU(N) gauge theory all physical states are SU(N) singulets, but these constraints are due to additional dynamical considerations and cannot be derived frome purely algebraic reasoning.
 
Hi...thanks for your answer. Well, i have read several times that charges in a gauge theory lie in the root system of the gauge group. For a quick check of the above statement, you can google> "charge wikipedia" and you will find such a claim. Of course, I'm referring to the wiki just because it is easy to check, but this statement is done in several places elsewhere.
 
Do you know what a root system of a Lie algebra is?
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top