QG Light Time Arrivals & Swiss Cheese Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential impact of large-scale cosmic structures, referred to as "swiss cheese," on the travel time of gamma-ray light arrivals. Participants express skepticism regarding a reported energy-dependent delay in light travel times observed by the MAGIC collaboration, emphasizing the need for multiple confirmations before accepting the phenomenon as real. Concerns are raised that the swiss cheese effect may not significantly interfere with observations, as both low and high-energy bursts would be uniformly affected by cosmic voids. The upcoming GLAST mission, scheduled for February 2008, is anticipated to provide further insights into this issue. Continued scrutiny and analysis of gamma-ray flares are essential to validate any claims regarding light travel time delays.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Will this muddy QG light time arrivals?
 
Space news on Phys.org
wolram said:
Will this muddy QG light time arrivals?

Wolram, your intuition seems correct to me. the large scale structure has these big voids in it and that should influence travel time, not necessarily in any way dependent on energy however

I should admit that after the MAGIC collaboration reported that ONE incident where they had observed a delay that depended on ENERGY there was a strong skeptical reaction on the part of a lot of people---on blogs and I imagine elsewhere too.
A lot of people are taking the position that they are going to have to see quite a number of gammaray flares analyzed, and the same energy-dependent delay found in each one, before they will believe it's real.

I can sympathise with this. So for now I will try carefully not to suggest that the delay is real---it could be just a random thing in the data or some effect at the source.

I would expect that the swiss cheese will not interfere too much because the whole flare or the whole burst would be affected by voids equally if at all---low and high energy alike.

but the whole thing will just have to be forgotten if it is not repeatedly observed.
GLAST should help. It has been delayed so often that I dread further delays---but barring such troubles it is scheduled to be launched February 2008.
http://www.nasa.gov/missions/highlights/schedule.html
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top