QM: Energy degeneracy at s=1/2 with 3 spin half particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Hamiltonian for three spin-1/2 particles, specifically examining energy degeneracy in the context of quantum mechanics. The author initially questions whether the four states for S=1/2 correspond to a degeneracy of four in energy eigenvalues. After further analysis, it is concluded that the Hamiltonian indeed results in two energy states, both exhibiting a degeneracy of four. The author also notes that solving the states can be approached by first determining the spin for two particles before adding the third. Ultimately, the problem was resolved successfully, and the solutions were submitted for a home exam.
Species8472
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a hamiltonian:

H = J\left(\frac{1}{2\hbar^2}S_{tot}^2 - \frac{9}{8}\right)

where S_{tot} = S_1 + S_2 + S_3

for 3 spin half particles in a cluster. The magnetic properties are governed entirely by their spin.

I have set up the possible spin combinations from Clebsch-Gordan to be:
From extending the triplet |1\;1\rangle, |1\;0\rangle, |1\;-1\rangle in two spin half particles with an additional particle I get:
<br /> \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1 \right\rangle}<br /> \begin{array}{lll}<br /> \left.<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \ket{\frac{3}{2}\;\frac{3}{2}} \\<br /> \ket{\frac{3}{2}\;\frac{1}{2}} \\<br /> \ket{\frac{3}{2}\;-\frac{1}{2}} \\<br /> \ket{\frac{3}{2}\;-\frac{3}{2}}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right\}<br /> &amp;\mbox{quadruplet} &amp; s=3/2 \\<br /> \\<br /> \left.<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \ket{\frac{1}{2}\;\frac{1}{2}}_1 \\<br /> \ket{\frac{1}{2}\;-\frac{1}{2}}_1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right\}<br /> &amp;\mbox{dublet} &amp; s=1/2<br /> \end{array}<br />

From extending the singlet |0\;0\rangle in two particles with another particle I get:
<br /> \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1 \right\rangle}<br /> \begin{array}{lll}<br /> \left.<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \ket{\frac{1}{2}\;\frac{1}{2}}_2 \\<br /> \ket{\frac{1}{2}\;-\frac{1}{2}}_2<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right\}<br /> &amp;\mbox{dublet} &amp; s=1/2<br /> \end{array}<br />

Now as you can see I have 4 states for S=3/2 and 4 states for S=1/2. Now my question is, does the 4 states for S=1/2 translate into a degeneracy of 4 for the energy eigenvalue in the equation:

H|s\;m\rangle = E|s\;m\rangle

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you are adding three angular momenta and you wish to go the "high road" you can't use Clebsch-Gordan coefficients; they are used to couple two angular momenta. For three you need to use Racah W-coefficients or Wigner 9-j symbols (look them up).

For the "low road", you need to expand the total spin operator in terms of one-electron operators

S^{2}=(s_1+s_2+s_3)^2=s_1^2+s_2^2+s_3^3+2s_1\cdot s_2+2s_2 \cdot s_3+2s_3\cdot s_1

replace the operator dot products with

s_i\cdot s_j=\frac{1}{2}(s_{i+}s_{j-}+s_{i-}s_{j+})+s_{iz}s_{jz}

calculate the matrix elements of the 8x8 Hamiltonian using the basis states |s1z>|s2z>|s3z>

diagonalize the Hamiltonian (you should be able to reduce it to block diagonal form of a 4x4 and two 2x2 submatrices) to get the eigenvalues that should give you the splittings and the eigenvectors.

The short answer to your question is "no, I don't believe that the two doublets are degenerate in energy."
 
kuruman said:
The short answer to your question is "no, I don't believe that the two doublets are degenerate in energy."

It turned out they are actually, I solved the problem later on. The hamiltoinian will give you two energystates both with degeneracy 4.

It is also fully possible to solve the states by first finding the spin for two particles and then add the third. I was not looking for the coefficients, so all I had to do was read the 6 J,M states from the 1x1/2 table. The singlet state was easy to solve.

The matrix approach is beyond the scope of this problem really, but thanks for replying :)

I handed the solutions in the day after i posted anyway. Was a home exam actually ...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top