QM: measurement vs interaction

oddthingy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm just wondering...

Regarding the single & double slit experiments...

Why does every interpretation say that the photographic screen is 'measuring' the position of the particle traveling towards it?

Why not say that the photographic screen interacts with an electron that is spread out over a larger amount of space, to make it coallesce into a smaller amount of space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it's only a single screen pixel that interacts with the electron and registers its impact, not the entire screen. The interaction is local.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top