Quadratic Equation: Analyzing Graph of y=(5-2x)^2+1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing the transformations of the quadratic function y=(5-2x)^2+1 compared to the parent function y=x^2. Participants express confusion regarding the specific transformations, particularly the dilation factor and translations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the effects of vertical and horizontal transformations, including the impact of the constants in the function. Some express confusion about the dilation factor and how it relates to the transformations of the graph.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the transformations, with some participants attempting to clarify the effects of specific components of the function. Guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the transformations, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct dilation factor or overall interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of exploration or the methods they can use to analyze the function.

TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
The graph of y=(5-2x)^2+1. What are the transformations that have occurred from y=x^2.

Im really confused with the transformations here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mainly confused about the dilation factor.
 
For y=f(x)+b, the effect of changes in b is to translate the graph of y=f(x) vertically through b units, so now you know what the +1 at the end does.

For y=f(kx), k>0, the effect of changes in k is to horizontally stretch or compress the graph of y=f(x) by a factor of 1/k , so that takes care of the 2x.

As you can see, everything in your transformed graph, including the minus sign does one simple translation, and combined you get your graph.

They're nicely summarized here and here's a more comprehensive explanation ;)

The dilation is due to the 2x, since every y-value is now doubled, it rises faster and so appears to have shrunk.
 
Last edited:
The answer to this question is: dilation factor of 4 parallel to the y axis, translation of 2.5 to the right and 1 unit upwards.
Okay so what I did was change it into this y=[-2(x-5/2)]^2+1, but that gives me a dilation factor of 2 parallel to the y axis. What am I doing wrong?
 
This is actually really simple:
1. expand the squared quantity
2. Try to rewrite this function in the form of y=af(bx+c)+d with f(x)=x^2
3. Use your textbook to interpret this answer.
 
thankyou thankyou ! would this method work with all these type of questions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K