I Quantifying deformation of a shape

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter gkiverm123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deformation Shape
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a method to quantify the deformation of a shape, with the aim of developing a single numerical metric. While measuring area reduction is suggested, it is noted that this approach does not fully capture deformation, as shapes can extend in different directions. Suggestions include using the Dice ratio and calculating mean strain through finite element analysis (FEA) of the deformed area. Additionally, considerations for scaling based on the size of the shape or using total work to deform the shape are mentioned. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of accurately quantifying deformation and encourages further exploration of these methods.
gkiverm123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Quantify deformation of a shape with single parameter
Hello all,

I hope this post is in the appropriate thread. Would anyone have any insight on a method to quantify deformation of a shape? For example, I attached two images of a white shape of interest at the center (one deformed and one undeformed). I'm trying to develop a metric/parameter (single number) that will quantify the degree to which the shape is being deformed.

One simple method would be to measure the reduction of area. However, this doesn't fully capture the deformation because sometimes the shape extends on the opposite side it is being deformed.

Thanks,
Vivek
 

Attachments

  • deformed.PNG
    deformed.PNG
    390 bytes · Views: 239
  • undeformed.PNG
    undeformed.PNG
    380 bytes · Views: 248
Physics news on Phys.org
gkiverm123 said:
I’m trying to develop a metric/parameter (single number) that will quantify the degree to which the shape is being deformed.
How about the Dice ratio?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sørensen–Dice_coefficient
gkiverm123 said:
this doesn't fully capture the deformation
No single parameter will fully capture something as complicated as deformation. You need to set your goal a little lower. You just want something that seems reasonable for the task
 
gkiverm123 said:
I'm trying to develop a metric/parameter (single number) that will quantify the degree to which the shape is being deformed.
Here's an idea: If the black part is a homogeneous solid, then it is deformed along with the white inside shape. You could calculate (FEA) the strain in the black part, and average to get a mean strain for the entire black part. That mean strain would be both quantitative and nondimensional, and should reflect the degree to which the shape is deformed. Some work on your part is necessary to verify this.

Check for size effects of the white area. It may be necessary to scale by the size of the white area, or by some shape parameter such as the ratio of perimeter to white area. Or the white area raised to some power. More work on your part...

Another possibility is to treat the white area as a homogeneous solid, and calculate the mean strain of that area using FEA. And another possibility is to treat the white area as a homogeneous plastic solid of unit thickness, and calculate the total work to deform it. Divide by the volume or by the area to get a mean work. This would not be nondimensional, but would be quantitative.

Sounds like a fun project. Enjoy.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top