Real life engineering problem I or guidance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanical engineering problem related to the analysis and assessment of offshore structures, specifically focusing on calculating the effective width of stiffeners within the footprint of intersecting pipes. The problem involves complex geometric considerations and the need for potential methods to approach the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Nick describes the problem of calculating the effective width of stiffeners in a joint where two pipes intersect at an angle, noting that the shape of the intersection resembles an egg rather than a simple oval.
  • Nick seeks advice on methods to solve for the projected width of the intersection shape at various angles and positions.
  • Some participants suggest resources, including books on geometry and computational design, that may provide relevant information for Nick's problem.
  • Nick considers the possibility of incorporating a factor into the ellipse equation to account for the varying angle theta in his calculations.
  • Nick also contemplates calculating arc lengths along the main pipe as another approach but expresses uncertainty about how to proceed with this method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity of the problem and the need for further exploration of geometric methods, but no consensus exists on a specific solution or approach to take.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenges of calculating effective dimensions in three-dimensional geometries and the potential need for advanced mathematical techniques. Specific assumptions and definitions related to the shapes involved remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Mechanical engineers, structural analysts, and students interested in geometric analysis and computational methods in engineering design may find this discussion relevant.

nickatkins
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I work as a mechanical engineer in Ws Atkins in the analysis and asessment of offshore structures. We are producing a MatchCad spreadsheet at the moment to do what we call a stiffened joint check.

I am posting here to try and get some advice on how to approach and/or solve my problem. I have a solid background in maths and have made some headway.

I will try to give some background to the problem in case anyone is interested :)

background:
A joint is simply the point where two structural members meet, for example a pipe joining onto another pipe.
If you can imagine inside the pipes we sometimes have what are called ring stiffeners, these are internal rings with a web and flange that stiffen the joint to reesist bending moments and shear forces.
Now imagine a smaller pipe joining a larger pipe, the main pipe is called the chord and the smaller joining pipe the brace. The chord is the one that contains stiffeners and can contain several of them. A stiffener only has an effect if it lies within the footprint of the joining brace as it resists incoming forces from the brace by using up its shear capacity. The flange like shape also helps to resist minor axis bending and compression/squashing of the pipe as it increases what's called the 2nd moment of area. In a cross section these internal stiffeners look like a T shape on the inside wall of a pipe. Internal stiffeners are used in a variety of structures not just joints and are similar to adding a web plate to a beam.

Now the problem:


I need to calculate the effective width of the stifferners within the footprint:
see attached image.

Imagaine two circular pipes one of diameter D and one d where D>d.

The smaller pipe intersects the larger one much like in the problem of two intersecting cylinders. In this case however the pipes can intersect at angle theta wherby θ ranges from 0-90 degrees.
Now if you imagine the area of contact of the two pipes eg. If you take a single pipe and take an angled cut you end up with an oval shape yes? we can solve the width of this oval at any point by using the equation of an elipse.
In my case however you do not get an oval shape because the surface is curved in 3 dimensions its like an oval projected onto a cylinder. The shape you actually get is more like an egg shape see my attached picture.

I need to solve the equation of this shape to give x for a given y and also for any given angle. I.e work out the projected width (as if you measured the 2d image) of the shape at any y position and also accounting for the fact that the egg shape is going to vary with the angle theta.

I know its a long shot posting here so I'm looking for advice as to where I should be looking or possible methods I can try to use.

I have found some useful information Ovals and Egg Curves it appears as though i need to add a factor into my elipse equation and this factor will vary with theta.

another approach i thought of was trying to work out the arc lengths at different points along the main pipe but I am not sure how to approach this.

If anyone has any feedback or knows of anyone that can help I would really appreciate your efforts!

Kind Regards

Nick
 

Attachments

  • effective width.png
    effective width.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 548
  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    86 KB · Views: 568
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello nick,

You may like to tax the corporate library for these books to help you

Geometry of Spatial Forms
(Analysis, synthesis, concept formulation and space vision for CAD)

Gasson

Computational Geometry for Design and Manufacture

Faux and Pratt

The Mathematical Description of Shape and Form

Lord and Wilson



I once worked for Atkins in another life are they still alive and kicking?
 
Hi Studiot,

Thanks for your reply I'll see if i can get a hold of those books they sound quite usefull.

Atkins is indeed still going strong, which department where you in?
 
I would add to this list a book on old fashioned engineering drawing such as

Geometry of Construction

Nichols and Keep

They have several chapters on interpenetration and intersection of complicated shapes.

, which department where you in?

Bridges
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K