Quantised energy of a confined system

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the quantization of energy in confined systems, specifically in the context of the hydrogen atom and the Bohr model. Participants explore the relationship between classical and quantum mechanical treatments of electron energy levels and the implications for understanding the Bohr radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the continuity of the energy graph plotted in their lecture, noting that energy is quantized in confined systems.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the energy function used, suggesting that the treatment may involve classical mechanics rather than quantum mechanics.
  • A participant provides the energy function E(r) = KE + PE, detailing its components and how it leads to the calculation of the Bohr radius.
  • Some participants argue that classical calculations can yield the correct value for the Bohr radius and energy levels, despite being fundamentally different from quantum mechanical treatments.
  • There is a suggestion that the classical approach is less illuminating than solving the Schrödinger equation, which provides a more accurate quantum mechanical perspective.
  • One participant introduces a semi-classical analysis using the uncertainty principle to estimate the ground state energy and size of an atom, acknowledging that this approach ignores the quantization of energy levels.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and implications of classical versus quantum mechanical treatments of energy in confined systems. There is no consensus on which approach is more illuminating or accurate, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in classical calculations, noting that while they can yield correct values for certain parameters, they do not fully capture the quantization inherent in quantum mechanics. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the energy function and its implications for understanding atomic structure.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
In one of my lectures, a graph was plotted of the total energy of an electron as a function of r, it's orbital radius. The function representing this curve was differentiated and set to zero to determine what value of r gave the minimum energy corresponding to the energetically favourable state of the electron, that being the Bohr radius.

My question is: this graph plotted was continuous, but I know energy is quantised in a confined system - so what have I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What was the energy function?

In quantum mechanics treatment of the hydrogen atom, if this is what your professor was taking about, typically the way the Bohr radius is found is by maximizing the probability density functions with respect to radial values. For the ground state wave functions of the hydrogen atom this result occurs for r=r(Bohr).

Bohrs treatment of the hydrogen atom was classical, so perhaps the energy function you speak of is the total energy of the interaction of an electron orbiting a proton. Perhaps it is something different. So if you could provide some more detail on this more help could be given.

You are right that in quantum mechanical treatment the energy levels are quantized. So if you were to try to maximize one of these values nothing useful would come out of it.

Furthermore, maximizing the energy with respect to a radial value doesn't really make sense in terms of finding the Bohr radius. Let's say that this energy function is the classical expression, the energy of the closest orbit like the ground state should be a minimum.

It is most likely that your professor plotted the probability density as opposed to energy.
 
We had that [itex]E(r) = KE + PE[/itex], so that [tex]E(r) = \frac{h^2}{8\pi^2 m r^2} - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r}[/tex] and then this was differentiated and set to zero to attain a value of r which yielded the minimum of the graph. This value of r was [tex]r = \frac{\epsilon h^2}{\pi m e^2}[/tex] which corresponds to the Bohr radius. (the graph is essentially the inter atomic potential of two charged particles, so yes, it is like the total energy of an electron orbiting a proton)
Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Anyone have any ideas?
 
Ideas for what?

The method you stated in your second to last post is a classical calculation that happens to produce the correct value of the most probable location of the a quantum mechanical treatment of the hydrogen atom ( an electron orbiting a proton) in its ground state.

The energy is continuous in the classical calculation. It is not continuous in the quantum mechanical calculation. The classical calculation is wrong. Yet it gives a correct value for the Bohr radii and energy levels.
 
So it is not wrong. I shouldn't say it that way but it is not nearly as illuminating as the quantum mechanics treatment. i.e. solving the Schrödinger equation.
 
This sounds like a semi-classical analysis using the uncertainty principle. By the uncertainty principle we know that the momentum of an electron confined to a region of size r must be at least of order hbar/r, so it must have kinetic energy of order hbar^2/(2 m r^2). So, speaking approximately, the ground state should minimize E = KE + PE = hbar^2 / (2 m r^2) + V(r).

This is an approximate, semiclassical analysis that ignores details like the quantization of energy levels. The point is that it gives you a quick and dirty way of estimating things like the size of an atom and its ground state energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K