I'm taking a QFT course and there is something that is bugging me. When we write out the equations in terms of generalised coordinates (q and p like in Lagrangian mechanics), it is always then taken as obvious that q and p satisfy the position momentum commutation relation. They arn't position and momentum so is there any prior justification for using the given commutator? (apart from the fact that when we do use it we get a nice working theory)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Quantising Fields

Loading...

Similar Threads for Quantising Fields | Date |
---|---|

A Quantum Field Theory - Why quantise fields? | Oct 19, 2016 |

A Canonical quantisation of the EM field | Aug 3, 2016 |

I Schrödinger Potential Fields with no Energy Quantisation? | Apr 21, 2016 |

Quantising a scalar field | Feb 26, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**