Quantum algorithm for order finding

  • Thread starter Thread starter jhendren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm Quantum
jhendren
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the quantum algorithm for order finding, but I can't find the proof anywhere. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance

\frac{1}{√r} Ʃ^{r-1}_{s=0} e^{2πisk/r} |μ_{s}> = |x^{k} mod N>
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I accidentally submitted thread before completion please disregard for now

-fixed
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'

Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'

This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
View full post »

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Meaning of "identify" & variations in different math context
Replies
5
Views
521
I Trouble with a passage in Zariski & Samuel's Commutative algebra text
Replies
5
Views
644
I Confused about small detail in rank-nullity theorem
Replies
1
Views
1K
Proving an inequality for order finding
Replies
2
Views
3K
Algorithm to find square root of a quadratic residue mod p
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Definition of minimal ideal using symbolic logic notation
Replies
3
Views
578
I The period-finding circuit for Shor's algorithm
Replies
3
Views
2K
How can I find a x such that the order of 2 mod x is n?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Challenge: Find the minimum amount of draws possible for a list of integers
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Dfns group action & group, written in terms of the other
Replies
26
Views
392

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top