What are the real-world benefits of quantum computers and how do they work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential real-world benefits of quantum computers and the current state of their development. Participants explore various applications, theoretical implications, and the differences between existing quantum computing technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate on the future advantages of quantum computers in daily life, science, and society.
  • There is a contention regarding the current status of quantum computers, with some asserting that they are still largely theoretical or experimental.
  • One participant mentions IBM's Quantum Experience as a resource for information on applications of quantum computing.
  • Concerns are raised about the legitimacy of D-Wave's quantum computers, with some academics questioning their classification as true quantum computers.
  • Participants discuss the capabilities of D-Wave's quantum annealer and its potential effectiveness for specific optimization problems, despite doubts about its general-purpose utility.
  • IBM's quantum computer is described as a general-purpose quantum computer that is currently too small to be practically useful.
  • Some participants highlight the differences between quantum annealing and gate-based quantum computing, noting their respective strengths and weaknesses.
  • There is mention of potential applications of quantum computing in fields such as cybersecurity and machine learning.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the performance and practical implications of existing quantum computing technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the current state of quantum computing, with multiple competing views on the functionality and classification of existing quantum computers, particularly regarding D-Wave and IBM technologies.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of quantum computing, the practical implications of current technologies, and the unresolved performance metrics of quantum systems.

  • #31
Yes IBM will let you use one.
Welcome to the IBM Q Experience!
Explore the world of quantum computing! Check out our User Guides and interactive Demos to learn more about quantum principles. Or, dive right into create and run algorithms on real quantum computing hardware, using the Quantum Composer and QISKit software developer kit.

My emphasis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I also appears that IBM has or is about to bring a 16 Qubit computer on line for their Q Experience program.
 
  • #33
gleem said:
I also appears that IBM has or is about to bring a 16 Qubit computer on line for their Q Experience program.

The 16-qubit machine has been online for a while. There is now a 20-qubit processor online (which not everyone can access) and the 50-qubit machine is -we are told- in the pipeline (assuming is passes all tests)
This page summarized (in real-time) the status of all the IBM hardware that can currently be accessed via the cloud
https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/qx/devices

Note also that it is expected that both Google and Rigetti Computing will at some point start offering cloud access to their machines.Btw, since this is probably not apparent to everyone: compare the T1 and T2 times of the 20 qubit machine and the 5 qubit machine; the coherence times of the former are better which is very interesting. They are making progress extremely quickly...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #34
As mentioned, several corporations, including mine, have quantum computers actually in use on practical problems, but I've not seen dramatic success stories to date. I was fortunate to get an in-depth briefing on this technology a couple of years ago.

The idea is that each qubit is in a quantum superposition of logic 0 and logic 1, so each run of an algorithm, involving multiple steps with multiple qubits, yields a solution which is also a superposition of many possible solutions. Presto: parallel processing! Nevertheless, the actual output of each run is only a single number, due to the "projection postulate" (ala von Neumann). So in order to achieve "parallel processing", the same algorithm has to be run many many times, and the ensemble of outputs fall into a statistical distribution per the Born rule. The statistical result can then be viewed as the desired answer.

The biggest obstacle is isolating the qubits from the environment so that they display quantum rather than classical behavior. This is approached using super-cooling, super-conducting, or other techniques. The success metric is the "coherence time", which is the average duration before the pure the quantum state decays due to environmental interaction. Limiting factors include the number of qubits which can be so isolated simultaneously, and the numbers of channels through which each qubit can be logically connected with other qubits without destroying quantum coherence.

What I find interesting is that quantum computers appear to be a practical application of quantum theory, without which they would not work as advertised. This is similar to Navstar GPS which requires relativity, even though some of the engineers didn't believe in it during development.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K