Quantum Entanglement: The Spooky Connection Between Particles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StationZero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entanglement Fun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum entanglement and its implications, particularly focusing on the nature of energy states in atoms and the measurement of spin states of entangled particles over large distances. Participants explore theoretical concepts and interpretations related to these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a single atom must account for the energy states of all other atoms in the universe, suggesting a complex interaction of energy levels.
  • Others argue that every hydrogen atom has the same ground state energy and can occupy it independently, indicating that atoms do not require permission from one another to occupy energy states.
  • There is a discussion about the ability of particles to remain entangled despite interactions with other particles or fields, with some asserting that such interactions do not necessarily collapse the entangled state.
  • Participants reference a YouTube video and a discussion by DrPhysicsA, with some expressing skepticism about the conclusions drawn in that context.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of ground states and how they can be considered different despite having the same energy levels, leading to clarifications about the role of spatial location in defining quantum states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement, particularly regarding the interpretation of energy states and the implications of quantum entanglement. Some viewpoints remain contested, and there is no clear consensus on the issues raised.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference external sources, such as Brian Cox's work and the EPR Paradox, which may influence participants' understanding and interpretations. The conversation reflects varying levels of familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to entanglement, energy states, and the implications of measurement in quantum systems.

StationZero
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Q1: If every atom has to adjust their energy levels according to every other atom in the universe, does that mean that any given single atom has its interior invaded by a catalog of energy states from every other atom in the universe? And only after accounting for all the energy states that have already been taken, then find a unique one?

Q2: How can the spin states of two particles be measured 100's of miles apart when they trypically will interact with other particles almost immediately, for example in the pair creation of an electron and positron for the test system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is Q1 inspired by the statements in Brian Cox's book and tv lecturs? If so, there is some relevant discussion here and on the physics stackexchange here
 
StationZero said:
Q2: How can the spin states of two particles be measured 100's of miles apart when they trypically will interact with other particles almost immediately, for example in the pair creation of an electron and positron for the test system?

Particles can easily remain entangled even after interacting with other particles or fields. The question is whether the interaction collapses the state (at least in some basis) and in many cases that answer is no. For example, a magnetic field can alter the path of a charged particle without affecting its spin. If it was spin entangled before, it would remain spin entangled.

For photons: they can go through fiber cable and be twisted and turned without yielding any information about their polarization. Again, if it was polarizationentangled before, it would remain polarization entangled.
 
Q1: If every atom has to adjust their energy levels according to every other atom in the universe, does that mean that any given single atom has its interior invaded by a catalog of energy states from every other atom in the universe? And only after accounting for all the energy states that have already been taken, then find a unique one?
You'll notice they don't do this, of course. Every hydrogen atom in the universe has the same ground state energy, and each electron happily occupies its ground state without obtaining permission from the other ones! That's because they are different states: (ground state in atom 1) is a different state from (ground state in atom 2), and so the overall wavefunction has no trouble being antisymmetric.
 
Thanks for the reply's gang.

Every hydrogen atom in the universe has the same ground state energy, and each electron happily occupies its ground state without obtaining permission from the other ones!
That makes more sense to me, and yes I was talking about the Brian Cox show but I also found it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x9AgZASQ4k&list=PL04722FAFB07E38E1&index=16&feature=plpp_video
These guys, though, seem to be saying explicitly that each atom has an entire catalog of every atoms energy state in the universe, and there's no budging on that. Am I reading this wrong?
 
I guess my confusion is well-shared. I've been reading the Brian Cox thread. Very animated. Thanks for the lead Sheaf.
 
Confusion can be contagious.

Regarding the youtube video, note that "DrPhysicsA" is a professional musician, whose only current involvement in physics is producing this series of videos. The present one is legit until the 10 minute mark, at which point it takes off.

Try looking up "EPR Paradox" in Wikipedia. DrPhysicsA follows this discussion word for word, but then arrives at the wrong conclusion. Scroll down to where the article says "Here is the crux of the matter" and see if you can spot the difference.
 
note that "DrPhysicsA" is a professional musician

Really? Brian Cox is a professional musician too! Maybe they should start a band called "the disentanglements" and write a song that clears up their shared miscommunications. I sure would like to hear it.:-pYuk Yuk
 
Bill_K said:
That's because they are different states: (ground state in atom 1) is a different state from (ground state in atom 2), and so the overall wavefunction has no trouble being antisymmetric.

in what way are the ground states different? ...even though they have same energy levels...
 
  • #10
They're located in different places. A state is characterized by its wavefunction ψ(x,t), and this is different depending on where the atom is.
 
  • #11
StationZero said:
Really? Brian Cox is a professional musician too! Maybe they should start a band called "the disentanglements" and write a song that clears up their shared miscommunications. I sure would like to hear it.:-pYuk Yuk



...lol... good joke !
The Dissentanglements !
 
  • #12
Thanks, physics humor doesn't get any nerdier than that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K