Graduate Quantum Field Theory: 3-4 Equation Steps Explained

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the transition from the third to the fourth equation in Quantum Field Theory, with participants seeking clarity on the steps involved. There is an emphasis on the role of delta functions in simplifying the integral over momentum variables. Participants highlight the importance of using LaTeX for clear mathematical communication, as images of equations hinder effective discussion. The delta function's application is noted as a key simplification in this transition. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of quantum equations and the necessity for precise mathematical representation.
Adwit
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
I had been trying to understand second quantization for few months from an easy book "Quantum Field Theory Demystified". But couldn't succeed. So, I have posted my problem.
I understand how do 3 no. equation come from 1 & 2 no. equation. But I am struggling to understand how do 4 no. equation come from 3 no. equation. Will anyone do the steps between 3 no. equation and 4 no. equation, please ?
oOAfyizG.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
@Adwit, we normally do not allow equations posted as images; that means they cannot be quoted usefully in responses. The PF LaTeX Guide (link at the bottom left of each post window) will help you to use LaTeX to format equations directly in your post.

That said, these equations are admittedly pretty gnarly so I can understand the temptation to use images.

Adwit said:
Will anyone do the steps between 3 no. equation and 4 no. equation, please ?

Look at the delta functions in the third equation. What do they tell you about the integral over ##p^\prime##? (Note that the integral in the third equation should really be a double integral; there is an integral over ##p## and an integral over ##p^\prime##.)
 
Ok, this is the last time I posted image of calculation. For now, I will write the calculation. Now, can you do the steps between 3 no. equation and 4 no. equation ?
 
Adwit said:
Ok, this is the last time I posted image of calculation. For now, I will write the calculation. Now, can you do the steps between 3 no. equation and 4 no. equation ?

Step 3 to step 4 is a "simple" application of the delta function. That is much simpler than understanding the equations that have gone before.

You must know what the Dirac delta function ##\delta(p-p')## is?
 
For what its worth, as far as I can tell there is indeed something funny going on with the factors of ##2\pi## here. If that is indeed the problem the best is probably if you show us what you got.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and PeroK
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
562
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
614
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K