Quantum field theory: an informative approach

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding accessible books on quantum field theory (QFT) that do not delve deeply into complex mathematics or theoretical formulations. Participants express their views on various authors and titles that may provide an informative approach to QFT for a general audience.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a book similar to Brian Greene's works that simplifies quantum field theory without heavy mathematical content.
  • Another participant argues that understanding quantum theory inherently requires mathematical knowledge and suggests Susskind's "The Theoretical Minimum" series as a more honest approach.
  • A different participant recommends Martinus Veltman's "Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics," highlighting its lack of mathematical prerequisites but also its potential for presenting "strange facts" without equations.
  • Veltman's other work, "Diagrammatica," is mentioned as a more technically precise but challenging text that avoids certain popular misconceptions about QFT.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about books that promise "mysteries" in physics, suggesting they may lack substance.
  • A participant mentions K. Huang's "Fundamental Forces of Nature: The Story of Gauge Fields" as a physically accurate book on QFT with minimal equations.
  • Another participant humorously acknowledges the variety of reading materials suggested in the thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to learning about quantum field theory without mathematics. There are competing views on the necessity of mathematical understanding and the value of certain recommended texts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express concerns about the clarity and reliability of books that promise to simplify complex topics, indicating a potential limitation in the accessibility of QFT literature for lay readers.

gtorassa
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Looking for a book that tries to explain the basis of quantum field theory in an informative approach, without complex formulas but with the spirit used by Brian Greene for his fantastic The Elegant Universe
I'm looking for a book that describes the quantum field theory without going deeply in the theory with formulas or complex description of the mathematics under the theory.
I know that this theory is really complex and it needs a deep knowledge of quantum physics in order to be understood.
But Brian Green succeeded in writing a book about String Theory for everybody, I'm wondering if such a book exists for quantum field theory too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Brian Greene's books are indeed fantastic but everything else than good textbooks about physics. You cannot understand quantum theory without math. A much more honest approach to make QT as simple as possible but not simpler is Susskinds corresponding volume in the "Theoretical Minimum" series.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and gtorassa
gtorassa said:
Looking for a book that tries to explain the basis of quantum field theory in an informative approach, without complex formulas but with the spirit used by Brian Greene for his fantastic The Elegant Universe

Here is a fantastic book about quantum field theory, fully featuring the Vacuum Fluctuation Myth (the fantasy about QFT intended solely for lay people):
In the Introduction, he writes:
Martinus Veltman said:
we cannot assume the reader to be familiar with the mathematical methods of quantum mechanics, so he will have to swallow strange facts without the support of equations.
... not only strange facts but also strange fiction!

Veltman won in 1999 the Nobel prize for physics for much more serious work. He also wrote a serious textbook on quantum field theory,
which is free of virtual particle fantasy, featuring instead a valid formal approach - but it is therefore a bit more difficult to understand. This technically precise (though not mathematically rigorous) book contains not a single mention of the word 'fluctuation' or ‘virtual’. In the Introduction, he writes:
Martinus Veltman said:
No one should have an excuse not understanding this book. Knowing about ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics and classical relativity one should be able to understand the reasoning.
This much to your excuse...
gtorassa said:
I know that this theory is really complex and it needs a deep knowledge of quantum physics in order to be understood.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gtorassa and vanhees71
A book about physics promising "mysteries" is usually not worth the paper it's printed on...
 
Three books and a video, now I can't say I don't have something to read at night :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K