Quantum field theory in a fractal universe (Calcagni)

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
At least one of us at this discussion board has expressed an interest in fractal modeling of spacetime, or of dynamics.*
This paper by Calcagni may be suggestive of what form such an approach could take.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0571
Quantum field theory, gravity and cosmology in a fractal universe
Gianluca Calcagni
39 pages, 4 figures
(Submitted on 4 Jan 2010)
"We propose a model for a power-counting renormalizable field theory living in a fractal spacetime. The action is Lorentz covariant and equipped with a Stieltjes measure. The system flows, even in a classical sense, from an ultraviolet regime where spacetime has Hausdorff dimension 2 to an infrared limit coinciding with a standard D-dimensional field theory. We discuss the properties of a scalar field model at classical and quantum level. Classically, the field lives on a fractal which exchanges energy-momentum with the bulk of integer topological dimension D. Although an observer experiences dissipation, the total energy-momentum is conserved. The field spectrum is a continuum of massive modes. The gravitational sector and Einstein equations are discussed in detail, also on cosmological backgrounds. We find ultraviolet cosmological solutions and comment on their implications for the early universe."

Until recently Calcagni was at Ashtekar's Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos (IGC) at Penn State. He has published papers in both string and LQG, as well as in other areas. In late 2009 he appears to have joined Hermann Nicolai's research outfit at Golm, the Albert Einstein Institute.

*Here is a related PF blog entry:
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=1213
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be of interest that Calcagni recently compiled a shorter review of his approach, accepted for Phys. Rev. Lett.:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0912/0912.3142v3.pdf

It is strongly related to and inspired by the scaling of the spectral dimension in various approaches, see e.g. the review by Carlip
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0909/0909.3329v1.pdf.

or the case of NCG (not in the sense of Connes' approach):
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0912/0912.0220v3.pdf

Also it might be worthwile to remember the thread about Carlips paper,
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=323417.

I like his approach because he basically turns the logic of the above papers upside down to obtain new insights. The scaling dimension is likely to tell us something about the UV behaviour of gravity because it is a property shared by almost all approaches to QG.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top